Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Jurisdiction & Lawful Money vs. mere Legal Tender

Expand Messages
  • vivus_spartacus
    There are those who do Not realize that Failure to Object is quite often failure to One s Case/Cause. TAKE NOTE: The U.S. Constitution, and the Laws of the
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 19, 2007
      There are those who do Not realize that Failure to Object is quite
      often failure to One's Case/Cause.



      TAKE NOTE:


      The "U.S. Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which
      shall be made in Pursuance thereof;...shall be the supreme Law of
      the Land; (Article VI Paragraph 2) ...and judicial Officers, both of
      the United States and of the several States, shall be BOUND
      (emphasis mine) by Oath or Affirmation, to support this
      Constitution;"
      (Article VI Paragraph 3)


      "No State shall...make any Thing but gold and silver Coin
      (i.e. Lawful Money) a Tender in Payment of Debts;... or Law
      impairing the Obligation of Contracts"
      (Article II Section 10 Paragraph 1)



      In Order to maintain "legal tender" status,

      FRN's Must be "REDEEMED IN LAWFUL MONEY ON DEMAND at the Treasury
      Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District
      of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank"
      Expressly stipulated in 12 USC 411



      The Law Requires that F.R. "Notes" (IOUs) Shall be "Redeemed in
      Lawful Money" Not Merely Exchanged for Other Forms of "Legal Tender"




      FYI: the U.S. Gov't Offical Fix of U.S. Dollar to Gold is $42.22 for
      One Ounce of Gold

      Where the accused (Hanson Defendants) were Operating within the
      Exclusive Jurisdiction Boundaries of the State of Nevada with a
      mutually agreed and Non Contested Private Contract between the
      Parties, the IRS & Federal Courts Lacked JURISDICTION!


      Therefore Not Only does the IRS Lack Any Jurisdiction/Authority to
      bring Private Parties into USDC, the Court Lacks Jurisdiction and
      Authority to process the Case, let alone demand that Lawful Money be
      CONverted into Debt Instruments (FRNs) that are NO Longer REDEEMED
      in the Manner Required by LAW!


      Had the Party/Parties of the Private Contract Objected and
      Challenged the Jurisdiction of the IRS, or the Court to even
      Hear/Process the Case, the Matter could have been Disposed of before
      the Trial began, by filing the proper Judicial Notice and Motion to
      Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.


      Even if the Motion to Dismiss had been denied at the lower Court,
      by filing a Motion to Appeal, & Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending
      Outcome of Appeal to District Court of Appeals would have most
      likely gotten the Matter Dismissed, since the IRS/DOJ/USDC do not
      want the majority of Americans to find out that they Lack
      Jurisdiction!

      Been There, Won That, when America had a peanut farmer in the Oval
      Office.

      Wisdom is the principal thing; Therefore get wisdom. And in all your
      getting, Get understanding. Proverbs 4:7

      "vivus spartacus"
      All Rights Reserved (In the 9th Amendment)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.