Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

illegal police actions

Expand Messages
  • chad kline
    1. I am dealing with illegal police actions (and ALL accomplices, which are never ending in government when it comes to illegal police actions), particularly
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 3, 2007
      1. I am dealing with
      illegal police actions (and ALL
      accomplices, which are never ending
      in government when it comes to
      illegal police actions), particularly
      violations of trespass, and the 4th
      amendment; where they make accusations
      of "impeding a police investigation"
      when I tell them not to trespass, and
      proceed to come onto private property,
      violently take me down, handcuff me,
      and drag me off my own property
      (I do nothing wrong/illegal).

      I expect this to happen in the future
      again, as it has happened many times
      in the past - the main culprit is a
      pesky well-connected neighbor with
      intent to harass. Some ideas I have
      had are the following, but I would
      appreciate any that might be better:

      a) I am considering presenting before a
      grand jury for criminal indictments?
      The downside of this method is that
      even if you get that far, you are
      still reliant upon the prosecutor
      to do the prosecution, unless
      someone knows something I don't?
      The positive side of this approach
      is that criminal prosecutions puts
      the fear of "government employment"
      into them.

      b) A private attorney general is a
      private party in the United States
      who brings a lawsuit that is considered
      to be in the public interest, thus
      entitled to recover attorney's fees
      if they prevail. The purpose of this
      principle is to provide incentive to
      private citizens to pursue suits that
      may be of benefit to society (42 USC 1988).
      The downside of this is that it is
      merely a civil case, it's tough to
      collect, and it doesn't really stop
      the problem. Also, if you lose, you
      get stuck with court/attorney costs.

      c) If a private attorney general obtains
      an injunction, he does so not for himself
      alone but also as a 'private attorney
      general,' vindicating a policy that
      Congress considered of the highest
      priority. The United States Congress
      has passed laws with "private attorney
      general" provisions that provide for the
      enforcement of laws prohibiting employment
      discrimination, police brutality, and
      water pollution. I wonder if this
      is the best idea - but I don't have
      the experience to know.

      d) Then there is the plain old civil suit:
      violations of fiduciary duty I guess? But
      when I try to get ahold of the duty (policy
      and procedures?) manual from the police, I
      just get obstructed, and get endless
      run-around. I would think I need this
      manual to construct a case? Maybe not,
      I have little experience in this area.
      I guess I could try a FOIA request, but
      I have to know exactly what to request,
      and I don't know exactly what to request.


      2. Some jurisdictions give people a right
      to file a police report, but I cannot find
      any such law where I live in Anchorage,
      Alaska. We have no Sheriffs, and the
      Mayor/FBI/Internal Affairs just laugh
      and then hang up on me when I push the
      issue of being denied the ability to
      file a police report on illegal police
      actions. Does anyone have any ideas on
      how to file a police report in such case?
      It probably won't have any effect, but at
      least it creates an official record.


      3. If you have someone that is constantly
      calling 911 to harass you, is there a
      method to stop them? I have been told
      that I have no right to 911 records, so
      I cannot get the evidence I would need to
      do anything about it pre-trial. I haven't
      been able to find law on this.


      4. When a law says something,
      regarding the word PLEASURE:

      A. Within the boundaries of the
      municipality no person shall cause,
      suffer, permit or allow XYZ except
      the following unless otherwise
      prohibited by law:

      1. XYZ for pleasure, religious,
      ceremonial, or like social purposes
      is allowed.

      2. XYZ requires a permit if ...

      Is "PLEASURE" used in contrast to
      "BUSINESS"? Is "PLEASURE" anything
      non-commercial? Or does it have some
      other limiting definition? I cannot
      find a legal definition for the term.
      If "PLEASURE" is an all-encompassing
      word, I don't understand it is followed
      with other restrictive itemizations.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.