RE: [tips_and_tricks] Defendant says that "dollars" have been withdrawn from circulation
>  Defendant further claims that there was error in the trialDefendant makes the further mistake of calling that which is measured
> court's refusal to grant his request that an amended complaint be
> filed stating the Government's claim in a value other than dollars.
> Defendant says that "dollars" have been withdrawn from circulation for
> all practical purposes and that the Government's federal reserve notes
> should be treated on a depreciated value basis.
(money) by the units of measurement (dollars). Dollars can no more be
withdrawn from circulation than quarts or tons can be withdrawn from
commerce. I've had dollars in my possession continuously since I was
six years old, including the dates he says there weren't any out there.
>  These arguments are groundless and similar contentions alongObviously.
> this line have been rejected as untenable.
> Article I, section 8, clause 5 of the Constitution providesThey are also free to change their minds, which is what must have
> that Congress shall have the power "To coin Money, regulate the Value
> thereof, and of foreign Coin . . ." As the Supreme Court stated in
> Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421, 448, 4 S. Ct. 122, 130, 28 L. Ed.
>  Under the power to borrow money on the credit of the United
> States, and to issue circulating notes for the money borrowed, its
> power to define the quality and force of those notes as currency is as
> broad as the like power over a metallic currency under the power to
> coin money and to regulate the value thereof. Under the two powers,
> taken together, congress is authorized to establish a national
> currency, either in coin or in paper, and to make that currency lawful
> money for all purposes, as regards the national government or private
occurred when they repealed HJR192. Then again, just because Congress
passes a law, doesn't mean they thought about it first, like the Patriot
Acts etc., or the original Federal Reserve Act.
>  Congress has exercised this power by means of delegation toBut there can be to FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES and Federal Reserve Notes.
> the Federal Reserve System, 12 U.S.C. � 411, and the definition of
> federal reserve notes as legal tender. 31 U.S.C. � 392; see Milam v.
> United States, 524 F.2d 629 (9th Cir.). There can therefore be no
> challenge to the legality of federal reserve notes.
> And we takeThey know what they are typing! No capitals! Anyone else notice?!
> judicial notice of the fact that federal reserve notes are valued in
> dollars. United States v. Anderson, 584 F.2d 369 (10th Cir.
It's not like they cannot find their "Shift" or "Caps lock" keys, is it,
all you "straw man" theorists out there?