the> We have discovered what could be a very important issue concerning
> use of a seal. Before attacking a sealed instrument the seal mustbe
> invalidated. The way a seal becomes invalidated is if someoneor
> something else uses it fraudulently, then the seal is invalid forboth
> parties.Wouldn't this require a court decision, or are conclusions on the part
of observers enough to make it official?
>We are trying to determine if, by the corporation of THE
> UNITED STATESOF AMERICA (purposely and fraudulently) using the GREAT
> SEAL of theunited States, is the GREAT SEAL now invalid.
"Determine"? For the "record"? How will this play out so we can all
rely upon the "determination" ?It appears it has been determined for hundreds of years and still is used regularly in other countries. The term: signed, sealed and delivered has legal significance. Numerous people have already deciphered the requirements for signing with your real name. The delivery part has been established and evidenced by numerous groups. Hence the only thing missing is the seal part. All three requirements must be met for any document to be valid with a real government and can preempt any fake government. It changes contract law from simple to special. I like being special, they give you a different bus when you are special. They won't mess with special people.
> Meaningwhen you receive a
> nothing either party signs is perfected, and
> document from the aforementioned parties, then sealit and sign it,
> after adding the verbiage you want, said action completethe document
> ad make it valid. In other words, anything they send you,you can add
> what you want, seal it, now it counts. Seems like this couldbe a real
> problem for the IRS also, acting under the seal of theTreasury.
I'd like to know who is doing the signing for any of the parties.
Americans sign many things that they aren't supposed to sign...Until something is sealed they can add or delete anything they want, including signatures.
John C., of the family Stuart
c/o postal service location
21001 N. Tatum Blvd. Suite 1630472
Phoenix, Arizona republic cf 85050 cf
John C.: Stuart is a Sovereign natural flesh and blood man.
All rights reserved Without Prejudice
Sovereign's confidentiality notice; This private email
message, including any attachment(s)is for the sole use
of the intended recipient and may contain privileged
and confidential information. Any/all political, private
or public entities, International, Federal, State, or
Local corporate government(s), private International
Organization(s) Municipality(ies), Corporate agent(s),
informant(s), investigator(s) et. al., and/or third party
(ies) working in collusion by monitoring my email(s), and
any other means of communication without my permission
are barred from any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution. With explicit reservation of
all my rights, without prejudice and without recourse to
any of my rights. Any omission does not constitute a
waiver of any and/or all intellectual property rights or
reserved rights. Notice to Principal is notice to Agent,
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender
See what's free at AOL.com.
- On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 12:10 -0400, mobinem@... wrote:
> signed, sealed and delivered has legal significance------------------------------
Yes, the legal significance is that until all three conditions are
complete, a covenant does not exist between the parties. see any
authority on the common law action of covenant to substantiate this