Re: [tips_and_tricks] (no subject)
- I am suing yahoo! Inc. for terminating my previous account. Hence why I am with google now. Last thursday I went in to court to answer a demurrer when I saw the most interesting thing. Not only was there a gold fringed flag standing on one side of the court room, there was a normal flag behind the judge draped like a banner of peace (See attached photo). You don't see that much anymore. I was also confused by it. One flag of war/admiralty law and another of peace in the same court, at the same time? I asked the judge which court this was, an article III, or an article IV court [United States Constitution]? He replied he didn't know.I almost broke out into hysteria...GamesMedic----- Original Message -----From: mobinem@...Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:07 PMSubject: [tips_and_tricks] (no subject)In a hearing last week I unfurled the US flag and the judge went pyscho on me. He ordered me to fold the flag and put it away. I asked him if he knew what the law of the flag was and he got angrier. He again said to fold the flag and I remarked "vi et armis I will take down the flag".Does anyone know how to file against the judge for his declaration of war?This happened in municipal court in Arizona.
John C., of the family Stuart
c/o postal service location
21001 N. Tatum Blvd. Suite 1630472
Phoenix, Arizona republic cf 85050 cf
John C.: Stuart is a Sovereign natural flesh and blood man.
All rights reserved Without Prejudice
Sovereign's confidentiality notice; This private email
message, including any attachment(s) is for the sole use
of the intended recipient and may contain privileged
and confidential information. Any/all political, private
or public entities, International, Federal, State, or
Local corporate government(s) , private International
Organization( s) Municipality( ies), Corporate agent(s),
informant(s) , investigator( s) et. al., and/or third party
(ies) working in collusion by monitoring my email(s), and
any other means of communication without my permission
are barred from any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution. With explicit reservation of
all my rights, without prejudice and without recourse to
any of my rights. Any omission does not constitute a
waiver of any and/or all intellectual property rights or
reserved rights. Notice to Principal is notice to Agent,
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender
See what's free at AOL.com.
All flags of the USA, I believe, are common law
flags like the one in Congress that you see.
In Congress, only common law controls.
Not admiralty, or equity, but only common law
from which all other laws emanate from.
The gold fringe is on a common law flag
only noting that admiralty can have jurisdiction
if called for.
If you top your pleading with the request for
common law, then that is what you'll have to get.
At 03:57 AM 4/3/07 -0700, you wrote:
I am suing yahoo! Inc. for terminating my previous account. Hence why I am with google now. Last thursday I went in to court to answer a demurrer when I saw the most interesting thing. Not only was there a gold fringed flag standing on one side of the court room, there was a normal flag behind the judge draped like a banner of peace (See attached photo). You don't see that much anymore. I was also confused by it. One flag of war/admiralty law and another of peace in the same court, at the same time? I asked the judge which court this was, an article III, or an article IV court [United States Constitution]? He replied he didn't know.
I almost broke out into hysteria...
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:07 PM
Subject: [tips_and_tricks] (no subject)
See what's free at AOL.com.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.25/744 - Release Date: 4/3/07 5:32 AM
- How naive to believe that your paper work as correct
as it may be to invoke a valid oaths and Art III court
setting, without some way to make ignoring it more penalizing
to 'judges' than collecting their awards for steamrollering
over you as usual. Reviewing various private legal lists
over last decade+, 99.99% is on what to do after one
injustice after another is done.
Flag and law arguments are basically valid,
having seen my spouse shock a Texas Circuit Ct
room and resist being made to cross the BAR to testify
against a friend charged with practising law without a license,
after being attached and forced into court room,
by staying seated in gallery, stating "I come under
flag of peace on the land of the united States of America,
displaying peace flag, adding and this is my foreign law
as she held up her Bible, that prohibits me from crossing
the BAR into the court's arena." The judge agreed she was
right as jaws dropped but then the defendant crossed the
BAR to represent himself and was found guilty : (
Court above didn't need her presence to get what they
wanted so don't expect this to work if you're the defendant.
Definitely worth mentioning in affidavits but not enough
firm ground to stand on alone.
Spend more efforts on judgement proofing before assets in
a pinch next time. After first court fraud done to you, you
end up in rapid expansion of more and more paper and
officials to try to force back in line with nil to risk
while you sweat bullets holes leaking out life reserves.