USA vs Fullerton Civil Action No.: 06-1253-T/An, SHOW CAUSE HEARING
- On March 29, 2007 the IRS using the agent of the United States,
known as "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" as the party in
interest is asking Federal Court Judge James Todd in Jackson,
Tennessee, to force Mrs. Fullerton, a 65 year old woman, who is
an Independent Contracted Courier, to Show Cause why she has
not attended a face to face IRS audit, although she has complied
with all Form 4564 information requests by correspondence.
That is, until the 4564's just kept on coming, and kept on coming,
but with not a one stating a reason why, as the original 4564 did,
which was "to verify the Standard Mileage Deduction (car/Truck).
Mrs. Fullerton complied with that request by affidavit, records
and correspondence. Whew! That was over with, finally....or so
she thought. Six months later in come the 4564's again requesting
all papers, records, books, etc, with absolutely no stated reason
provided, nor any regulations to back it up. A simple verification
audit had been escalated to an economic reality audit without any
given reason, or suspicion that there was any evidence of
Mrs. Fullerton informed the alleged Revenue Agent Elizabeth A.
Walker that she would be happy to comply, if the alleged Revenue
Agent would please send her an unbroken chain of delegation
orders, to wit; "demanded the Secretary of the Treasury's
Delegation of Authority Order, and the District Director's
Delegation of Authority Order for Mrs. Walker to issue an
Administrative Summons, and to serve aforementioned summons.
Respondent also demanded the experience and qualifications of
any Agent(s) conducting or involved with this random audit, and a
copy of the Treasury Delegation Order, along with a copy of its
entry into the Federal Register, with OMB Number filed with the
General Accounting Office, and a copy of its codification in the
United States Code, conferring the authority to conduct said
audit, and the delegation powers to the Agent, (Pocket
Commission), conferring the authority to amend any tax return,
issue a refund, or to assess additional taxes.
She also wished to see a copy of the statute that gives rise to the
alleged tax liability in the first instance as Respondent's research
has been unable to locate said liability."
Wow. Imagine, a 65 yr. old lady asking for such? Judging by the
Revenue Agent's reply, Mrs. Fullerton must have just committed a
capital crime! The alleged Revenue Agent then sent a blanket Title
26 USC answer, with a blanket Treasury Delegation Order 4
explanation, and again threatened to assess additional taxes where
no evidence existed to do so. Well, that rings hollow since Mrs.
Fullerton has thrice stated, "As far as I am concerned this audit is
over and I demand that you prepare a final report, (assessment), at
once based on the information submitted and to transmit it to me
without delay." Once a taxpayer demands a final report, it is then
incumbent upon the Revenue Agent to do so, and assess at once
whatever the supposed tax deficiency is, and if Mrs. Fullerton
believes it is incorrect and arbitrary, then she may appeal to the
IRS Appeals Division.
Well, the feisty 65 yr old simply stated that if no authorities are
presented, then no face to face audit. It was very apparent this had
become a test of wills. On one side, the Revenue Agent is out to
prove her Divine Authority to force a taxpayer to do as she says,
and not what the law requires. On the other, you have someone
not giving in and stating that absent a showing of the authority to
summons, and the express authority to serve an Administrative
Summons, then Mrs. Fullerton will not honor the request.
Mrs. Fullerton used the Shultz vs. IRS decision to force this
Show Cause hearing, since she figured it would give her the right
to be heard, and the alleged Revenue Agent took her up on it.
Now, you might think this is a good thing, but it seems it is isn't.
When Mrs. Fullerton tried to have her son present the case, since
he has a Centralized Authorization File number issued by the IRS,
the Judge threatened her son with reporting him to the proper
authorities for practicing law without a license or BAR card. Gee.
Wonder why the Judge would practice law from the bench, if he
has no interest in the outcome of the case?
(Aside: Under Rule 17 c FRCP, a NEXT FRIEND can represent
another, especially a fmaily member, as long as they do not take
any pay, do not hold out they practice law, and claim no BAR
Simple. He does. As exposed on this website, contained within
the 1974 Privacy Act, Publication 6372
all US Attorneys and all Federal Judges have a secret file kept by
the IRS and Treasury Dept. on them to use if they step out of line,
and of course, the very fact that the Judge's violate the
Constitution Article III, Section I, by filing a 1040 themselves,
and thereby diminishing their own pay voluntarily, also violates
the "Good Behavior" clause as well.
Now, if any want the full story or the filings, including the
jurisdictional challenge, then say so on the forum and I will post
as much as the administrator will allow, and I will let you know
how it goes.
The moral of this story is a simple one. If a lady whom does not
claim "tax protestor" status and simply that of a "tax payer" with
50 yrs. of Returns as evidence of good faith, then what hope do
any of the sheople have? Just as wells to fight now, or it is for a
certainty you will later on. Do you know how to fight them? Now
is the time to learn, just as I have had to. This is not an
advertisement and I sell nothing.
This is just a commentary to the wise and a little birdie in the ears
of all the wimps hiding out and scamming others for no other
reason than to steal their money to then stab them in the back and
have them thrown in prison. These elements are the disinfo agents
posing as PAY-triots, thereby outing many of the gullible of the
The ones I speak of are the Pembina
Nation, (of the Chippewah's? As they are the only recognized
subjugated group of Native Americans that have Pembina in their
Tribal designation, except the Red Rivers Tribe), and as the
conquered, are thus subject to the Plenary Powers of Congress.
Then of course, we have the Redemptionists, who want to play their
rigged game, but then wind up in prison for submitting false
security instruments, thus fraud upon the US, and only after they
declare for the record they are the surety for these fictional
enitites by filing a UCC-1.
Have any of you ever thought that the magic bullet may just be, not
in some flawed theorum? That it may be hidden right in plain sight?
Do a little research on your own and realize that ALL OF TITLE 28
USC is the TERRITORIAL LAW CODES or it would be unconstitutional.
There are no Article III courts vested with jurisdiction cognizant
of anything other than FEDERAL CITIZENS. Look up Article III,
Section II, and find me one in TITLE 28, Sections 88-131. I dare
you. Then when you find that Hawaii has one, then look at Article
III, Section I and find me a Federal Judge not filing a 1040, and
in "Good Behavior" to sit upon that Court? The Judges are
territorial judges, and the courts are territorial courts. One
cannot exist without the other to have any jurisdiction outside the
federal territories established within a state of the Union, ceded
by that state, and accepted by Congress.
Addendum: Look up the word "congress" in the dictionary. The true
meaning of the government corruption is found in this definiton:
congress: coitus; sexual intercourse.
Anyone knowledgeable and would care to share any tips with us,
please don't be shy. Respond asap. We need all the help we can
Oh, by the way....I am the son mentioned above.