illegal service of summons for small claims
- More to the point, what is the "process service" for? It is to inform. If
you were informed, which you obviously were since you are complaining about how
it was done, they you will have a difficult time convincing a court it was
not an acceptable delivery.
Moderator/Bear: After having recently read a bunch of Florida cases on sufficiency of process, I want to insert here that I disagree with the point made above. Those Florida cases said that the service of process rules and statutes must be strictly complied with. There were many cases that were reversed in Florida, on appeal, because the issue was properly preserved in the trial court; and no general appearance was made.
You may have a better chance fighting the judgement then fighting a
technicality that would require you lying to be victorious. Our creator stands with
us only when we stand according to his rules and I doubt he sides with the
side that is lying.
Moderator/Bear: Oppression is defined as the unjust use of force or authority. We bring oppression upon ourselves by not being doers of Jahuwah's Word. Since it is his will that we be doers of his Word, it follows then that is also his will that we be free from unjust use of force or authority. Jahuwah didn't make the rules respecting service of process; but once men make those rules His expectation is that they be followed especially with respect to the doers of the Word. I was shown that it is my job to use their own laws against them.
Just my opinion and belief.
of the family Stuart
c/o postal service location
21001 N. Tatum Blvd. Suite 1630472
Phoenix, Arizona republic cf 85050 cf
John C.: Stuart is a Sovereign natural flesh and blood man.
All rights reserved Without Prejudice
Sovereign's confidentiality notice; This private email
message, including any attachment(s)is for the sole use
of the intended recipient and may contain privileged
and confidential information. Any/all political, private
or public entities, International, Federal, State, or
Local corporate government(s), private International
Organization(s) Municipality(ies), Corporate agent(s),
informant(s), investigator(s) et. al., and/or third party
(ies) working in collusion by monitoring my email(s), and
any other means of communication without my permission
are barred from any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution. With explicit reservation of
all my rights, without prejudice and without recourse to
any of my rights. Any omission does not constitute a
waiver of any and/or all intellectual property rights or
reserved rights. Notice to Principal is notice to Agent,
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender
> Moderator/Bear: ... There were manyAnd that is the key point most people do not understand until after it
> cases that were reversed in Florida, on appeal, because the issue was
> properly preserved in the trial court; and no general appearance was
is too late. They are tricked into making a general appearance. How do
you stop people from doing that?
> You may have a better chance fighting the judgement then fighting aYes, hypocrisy sucks. And now knowing that HJR192 is void, a judgment
> technicality that would require you lying to be victorious. Our
> creator stands with
> us only when we stand according to his rules and I doubt he sides with
> the side that is lying.
might be fun to fight, if only to get some clarification as to what may
now be exacted from those unwilling to cooperate.
> Moderator/Bear: Oppression is defined as the unjust use of force orAnother good reason to avoid cooperating with the dishonest Federal
> authority. We bring oppression upon ourselves by not being doers of
> Jahuwah's Word. Since it is his will that we be doers of his Word, it
> follows then that is also his will that we be free from unjust use of
> force or authority.
Reserve System (unjust weights and measures)!
> Jahuwah didn't make the rules... but once men makeHow might you use the info that HJR192 is repealed? Any ideas come to
> those rules His expectation is that they
> be followed especially with respect to the doers of the Word. I was
> shown that it is my job to use their own laws against them.
> Just my opinion and belief.
mind lately? It looks like if using their own laws against them is the
goal, you now have more work available to perform!
I was pleased to see all those cases posted on the money that pretty
much show that the Fed house of cards cannot stand forever and is
ultimately forbidden by the constitution. It will be interesting to see
their defense to the removal of conditions created by HJR192.
This is a typical argument I've heard from many lawyers who work
collection cases. I'm just grateful our judges don't agree with you.
There have been a number of large collection agencies who were heavily
fined due to a repeated pattern of improper service.
The fact is that every state has a very clearly worded law on how to
serve a process. I do it here in Michigan. And I've seen many people
abuse the law in order to try and serve people.
Then it's up to the defendant to prove they were wronged.
If properly served, you will never have an issue with having a cased
tossed out. Try it sometime and quit taking the easy way out.
- It all depends on the state you live in, and their laws.
In Michigan, this would be an improper service, unless the process
server had received an "alternate service" order. In that case, he
could give it to anyone at the home of legal age, or simply tape it to
the front door.
In Washington, it would be legal, as they simply have to serve it upon
a person of "reasonable age" at the residence address. Obviously, for
this reason, there are a terrible amount of bad services in
Washington. Many times it's delivered to the "last known address" and
the defendant never knows h
> MY QUESTION IS: SOME PERSON CAME TO MY HOME AND KNOCKED AND MY 16 YR
> OLD DAUGHTER ANSWERED AND HE GAVE HER PAPERS TO APPEAR IN SMALL CLAIMS
> COURT AND SAID TO HER " YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED" iS THIS SERVICE LEGAL?