Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.


Expand Messages
  • warren nelson
    I wish I could get Geraldine or someone else in this email, to help me with my Right of Travel case, where I am fighting this corrupt legal system, over me not
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 9, 2003
      I wish I could get Geraldine or someone else in this
      email, to help me with my Right of Travel case, where
      I am fighting this corrupt legal system, over me not
      having a drivers license, because I travel by Right
      and not corporate STATE granted privilege. Anyone are
      to give me a hand?????????

      Warren Nelson
      --- legalbear <bsmyth13@...> wrote:
      > American Legal System Is Corrupt Beyond Recognition
      > Judge Tells Harvard
      > Law School
      > By Geraldine Hawkins
      > March 7, 2003
      > 3-7-3
      > The American legal system has been corrupted almost
      > beyond recognition,
      > Judge Edith Jones of the U.S. Court of Appeals for
      > the Fifth Circuit,
      > told the
      > Federalist Society of Harvard Law School on February
      > 28.
      > She said that the question of what is morally right
      > is routinely
      > sacrificed to what is politically expedient. The
      > change has come because
      > legal philosophy has
      > descended to nihilism.
      > "The integrity of law, its religious roots, its
      > transcendent quality are
      > disappearing. I saw the movie 'Chicago' with Richard
      > Gere the other day.
      > That's the way the public thinks about lawyers," she
      > told the students.
      > "The first 100 years of American lawyers were
      > trained on Blackstone, who
      > wrote that: 'The law of nature dictated by God
      > himself is binding in all
      > counties
      > and at all times; no human laws are of any validity
      > if contrary to this;
      > and such of them as are valid derive all force and
      > all their authority
      > from this original.'
      > The Framers created a government of limited power
      > with this
      > understanding of the rule of law - that it was
      > dependent on transcendent
      > religious obligation,"
      > said Jones.
      > She said that the business about all of the Founding
      > Fathers being
      > deists is "just wrong," or "way overblown." She says
      > they believed in
      > "faith and reason," and this did not lead to
      > intolerance.
      > "This is not a prescription for intolerance or
      > narrow sectarianism," she
      > continued, "for unalienable rights were given by God
      > to all our fellow
      > citizens. Having lost sight of the moral and
      > religious foundations of
      > the rule of law, we are vulnerable to the
      > destruction of our freedom,
      > our equality before the law and our self-respect. It
      > is my fervent hope
      > that this new century will experience a revival of
      > the original
      > understanding of the rule of law and its roots.
      > "The answer is a recovery of moral principle, the
      > sine qua non of an
      > orderly society. Post 9/11, many events have been
      > clarified. It is hard
      > to remain a
      > moral relativist when your own people are being
      > killed."
      > According to the judge, the first contemporary
      > threat to the rule of law
      > comes from within the legal system itself.
      > Alexis de Tocqueville, author of Democracy in
      > America and one of the
      > first writers to observe the United States from the
      > outside looking-in,
      > "described
      > lawyers as a natural aristocracy in America," Jones
      > told the students.
      > "The intellectual basis of their profession and the
      > study of law based
      > on venerable
      > precedents bred in them habits of order and a taste
      > for formalities and
      > predictability." As Tocqueville saw it, "These
      > qualities enabled
      > attorneys to stand apart from the passions of the
      > majority. Lawyers were
      > respected by the citizens and able to guide them and
      > moderate the
      > public's whims. Lawyers were essential to tempering
      > the potential
      > tyranny of the majority.
      > "Some lawyers may still perceive our profession in
      > this flattering
      > light, but to judge from polls and the tenor of
      > lawyer jokes, I doubt
      > the public shares
      > Tocqueville's view anymore, and it is hard for us to
      > do so.
      > "The legal aristocracy have shed their professional
      > independence for the
      > temptations and materialism associated with becoming
      > businessmen.
      > Because
      > law has become a self-avowed business, pressure
      > mounts to give clients
      > the advice they want to hear, to pander to the
      > clients' goal through
      > deft manipulation of the law. While the business
      > mentality produces
      > certain benefits, like occasional competition to
      > charge clients lower
      > fees, other adverse effects include advertising and
      > shameless
      > self-promotion. The legal system has also been
      > wounded by lawyers who
      > themselves no longer respect the rule of law," The
      > judge quoted Kenneth
      > Starr as saying, "It is decidedly unchristian to win
      > at
      > any cost," and added that most lawyers agree with
      > him.
      > However, "An increasingly visible and vocal number
      > apparently believe
      > that the strategic use of anger and incivility will
      > achieve their aims.
      > Others seem
      > uninhibited about making misstatements to the court
      > or their opponents
      > or destroying or falsifying evidence," she claimed.
      > "When lawyers cannot
      > be
      > trusted to observe the fair processes essential to
      > maintaining the rule
      > of law, how can we expect the public to respect the
      > process?"
      > Lawsuits Do Not Bring 'Social Justice'
      > Another pernicious development within the legal
      > system is the misuse of
      > lawsuits, according to her.
      > "We see lawsuits wielded as weapons of revenge," she
      > says. "Lawsuits are
      > brought that ultimately line the pockets of lawyers
      > rather than their
      > clients. The
      > lawsuit is not the best way to achieve social
      > justice, and to think it
      > is, is a seriously flawed hypothesis. There are
      > better ways to achieve
      > social goals than
      > by going into court."
      > Jones said that employment litigation is a
      > particularly fertile field
      > for this kind of abuse.
      > "Seldom are employment discrimination suits in our
      > court supported by
      > direct evidence of race or sex-based animosity.
      > Instead, the courts are
      > asked to revisit petty interoffice disputes and to
      > infer invidious
      > motives from trivial comments or work-performance
      > criticism.
      > Recrimination, second-guessing and suspicion plague
      > the workplace when
      > tenuous discrimination suits are filed creating an
      > atmosphere in which many corporate defendants are
      > forced into costly
      > settlements because they simply cannot afford to
      > vindicate their
      > positions.
      > "While the historical purpose of the common law was
      > to
      === message truncated ===
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.