Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [tips_and_tricks] People not generally subject to law

Expand Messages
  • cshrclrd@eastex.net
    There is some fruitful research in the area of trusts which can be legally form without your knowledge and consent. -Scott Harclerode ... From: legalbear Sent:
    Message 1 of 3 , Mar 3, 2003
      There is some fruitful research in the area of trusts which can be legally form without your knowledge and consent.
      -Scott Harclerode


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: legalbear
      Sent: 3/3/03 8:30:28 AM
      To: lookin2c@...;tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [tips_and_tricks] People not generally subject to law

      > Jim: I just reposted that. It looks like you could look up the
      > definition for Code in Black's the cite would be there. You could do a
      > search at Versuslaw.com for the name of that case. Also, Yick Wo v.
      > Hopkins would be more authoritative being Supreme Court. Inside the
      > cover of West's Digests there is a table of abbreviations that you could
      > look up what reporter Wn(2nd) refers to. I suspect that it is an
      > obscure case from a foreign jurisdiction to the one you're in. The most
      > it could do is point you to cases in your jurisdiction using Sheppard's.
      > It occurred to me the other day that we need to do more studying on
      > principles of contracts because that's where they've tricked us. How
      > can they compel us to contract? Can a government use force to compel us
      > to contract? I guess they could if the courts let 'em. At one point
      > the use of "without prejudice" on drivers licenses and registrations was
      > effective, but, they're like the mafia. They make us pay protection
      > money; who cares about law. Bear
      >
      > For mailing use: Excellence Unlimited, 17795 E. Eldorado Place #201,
      > Aurora, CO 80013 303-484-9895 fax 810-958-6113
      > <http://www.legal-research-video.com/> www.legal-research-video.com
      > www.legalbears.com
      > To subscribe to Tips & Tricks for court send an email to:
      > <mailto:tips_and_tricks-subscribe@yahoogroups.com>
      > tips_and_tricks-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: lookin2c@... [mailto:lookin2c@...]
      > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 6:21 AM
      > To: shining@...
      > Subject: Re: People not generally subject to law
      >
      > Greetings,
      >
      > YES, we know that we "contract into subjection"!
      > Do you have the Rhay case or a more informative cite for it?
      >
      > Deo volente,
      > Jim
      >
      > "...as He died to make men Holy,
      > Let us live to make men free."
      >
      > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:49:26 -0500 "Milo" <shining@...> writes:
      > From: legalbear [mailto:bsmyth13@...]
      > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:10 AM
      > Subject: People not generally subject to law
      > Code is "not the law" (In Re Self v Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261) defined by
      > Black's Law Dictionary as prima facie, which is color of law, color is
      > "counterfeit or feigned".
      >
      > What the real law is the common law as described in the above case and
      > the code itself. The People are not "subject to law" generally (Yick Wo
      > v Hopkins, 118 US 356, 370) except for the criminal codes which is
      > codified common law.
      >
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.