Re: [tips_and_tricks] Fwd: You have more rights than a lawyer
- Greetings,Check out what the Supreme Court had to say about claiming "rights":U.S. v Johnson; 76 F. Supp. 538."The privilege against self-incrimination is neitheraccorded to the passive resistant, nor the person whois ignorant of their rights, nor to one who is indifferentthereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can beretained only by sustained combat. It cannot beclaimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is only validwhen insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person."If one "right"... why not any or all "rights"? Notice the "war words"?We are at war domestically ladies & gents!And then see "Attorney & Client" in Corpus Juris Secumdum whichsays your interests in the hands of an attorney are like 7th in line, afterhis buddies!Corpus Juris Secundum Vol. 7, section 4;
Attorney and Client:
His first duty is to the courts (1) and the public, (2)
not to the client, and wherever the duties of his client
conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court,
(3, 4, 5, 6, to include the judge, the clerk, the bailiff,
the recorder) in the administration of justice, the
former must yield to the latter.
JimWhen a man who is honestly mistaken finds the Truth...
He will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~On Tue, 30 May 2006 02:42:56 -0000 "law_self_help" <law_self_help@...> writes:
> <law_self_help@...> wrote:believe a Pro Se has more rights than a lawyer: