2565Fw: CCRA-jurisdictional challenge - generic - pass it on
- Aug 30, 2003This is for 'natural people', although 'Free Men in Christ' or 'Bond Servants of Christ' could adapt this form to their use as well.A 'natural person' is just that: unregenerate, by definition. As I have come to understand, this term should not be used by those wishing to be entirely free of the system, as it is still a 'legal term' in their Matrix. Eldon Warman prefers 'free will man'. The whole 'person' thing took me a while to grasp, but I see now that 'they' like this 'person' designation, so 'we' should not.Blessings to David Butterfield for forwarding this example to us.darryl----- Original Message -----From: David ButterfieldSent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 9:36 PMSubject: Fw: CCRA-jurisdictional challenge - generic - pass it on
With authority provided by Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly
Educator and Defender of Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
To: The natural person acting in capacity of August 30, 2003.
“J. LE VECQUE” or “JOSEPH LE VECQUE”
Collections Contact Officer
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency
Southern Interior B.C. Tax Services Office
277 Winnipeg Street,
Penticton, British Columbia.
Reference: “REQUIREMENT TO PAY” sent to ____________ and relating to a “Tax Debtor” identified as
the natural person, ____________, and showing an “Account number 488892209 RI”.
Please find attached to this letter, a copy of “Notice of Appointment of Plenipotentiary” signed by the natural person, _____________ and as proof of my lawful authority to act on his behalf. I am also working under a contract for hire with _______________, to act as human rights educator and where necessary, as human rights advocate and defender.
Please also find enclosed with this letter, a binder addressed to the recently murdered United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Sergio Vieira de Mello, and sub-addressed to the Chief Prosecutor – The World Court, The Hague.
The binder contains numerous pieces of valid evidential documentation, including but not limited to, excerpts from various statutory instruments created by the “Province” of British Columbia and also, by “Canada”.
As you will see, these statutory instruments confirm as fact, that, “in law”, the term “province” actually means one of the “territories” and not one of the geographical areas known “outside of law” (on the street), as being provinces. The sad truth is, that in fact, not one “province” (geographical area) is included in any “law” operating and therefore, “in law”, not one of the provinces fall under the jurisdiction of any law of “Canada”, or any “Provincial” Legislature. Only Natural Law and the rules of Common Law, as reflected in Magna Charta, Petition of Right, English Bill of Rights, Statute of Habeas Corpus and the Act of Settlement, and International Laws, have application and/or jurisdiction within any one of the “provinces”.
There is a significant difference made to the meaning of the term “province” when it is spelled with an upper-case (capital) “P”, as this spelling would indicate that the term is being used in a corporate sense, referring to a corporate entity. This is confirmed by “The Canadian Style – A Guide to Writing and Editing”, published by the Translation Bureau, Department of Public Works Canada, the pertinent excerpt of which is included in the binder. On the other hand, by spelling “province” with a lower-case “p”, one would be referring to the geographical area. I hope this is clear for you.
Much to my dismay, the facts contained in the enclosed binder have so far proven to be irrefutable by any lawyer or accountant. Just the same, and in hope that somehow these facts can be refuted; I am compelled to provide you with the opportunity to do so. However, estoppel by conduct shall apply. Therefore, if either you, or any individual at the “Canada” Customs and Revenue Agency (C.C.R.A.), or any individual working within Justice “Canada”, were able to provide valid documentation that would disprove these facts and establish your lawful authority to operate within the “province” of British Columbia, then this challenge to your jurisdictional authority would be withdrawn.
Should either the C.C.R.A., or Justice “Canada”, fail, neglect, or refuse to respond to this jurisdictional challenge, by providing me valid documentation disproving the facts contained in the enclosed binder, and within 30 (thirty) days from your receipt of the same, it will be concluded, that no such lawful authority/jurisdiction exists. Should that be the case, all agents/Agencies operating within the provinces on behalf of the “Government of Canada”, must cease and desist (two)
their activities and immediately remove themselves from the provinces. In the alternative, prepare to answer to charges, as will be filed in the World Court and/or the International Criminal Court.
Please understand, this letter should not be construed as inviting a confrontation, but rather to the purpose as expressed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.”
On behalf of ____________, natural person inhabitant of the geographical area known “outside of law”, as the province of British Columbia, and with utmost sincerity, I await your most appropriate response.
Educator and Defender of Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.