18905Re: Judge rules that unrebutted affidavits do NOT mean agreement
- Jul 7, 2012--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Mike <micflah@...> wrote:
> What is an "agent"?Anytime I open my Black's Law and look under "agent,"
> If that doesn't SCREAM "commercial claim" I don't know
> what to tell you!
I hear no screams, or SCREAMS. Besides, no such
"commercial claim" was made by me, nor did the judge
say one was being made. A lawyer may be an agent, but
not all agents are lawyers.
> The first step to win any case is to deny jurisdiction...The refusal to enter jurisdiction was asserted no
> but that is only the first step!
> What do you do to back this up?
> Apparently you failed to back up this assertion
> otherwise you would have won that case.
less than four times. The conclusion above is
Lest anyone else get confused over what what originally
posted, I refused to enter into that court's jurisdiction,
and the judge acknowledged that refusal by refusing to
deal with the physical man present and demanded that the
fictional name on the license respond, which never happened.
There was nothing else to "win," in that regard.
For clarity, I asserted in the post that the jurisdictional
challenge part worked and won that battle, but I may have
lost the war for lack of knowing how to follow-through, and
The rest is silence, on this one.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>