17343Re: Little g is JEALOUS of BIG G
- Dec 6, 2009MARRIAGE LICENSES are a perfect way to illustrate people's UNQUESTIONING
obedience to SUPPOSED authority.
LICENSE, contracts. A right given by some competent authority to do an act,
which without such authority would be illegal. The instrument or writing
which secures this right, is also called a license. Vide Ayl. Parerg, 353;
15 Vin. Ab. 92; Ang. Wat. Co. 61, 85. (Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856)
License fee or tar. The price paid to governmental or municipal authority
for a license to engage in and pursue a particular calling or occupation.
See home Ins. Co. v. Angusta, 50 Ga. 537; Levi v. Louisville, 97 Ky. 394, 30
S. W. 073, 28 L B- A. 480. BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, 2ND EDITION, pg. 724
LICENSE. A personal privilege to do some particular act or series of acts
on land without possessing any estate or interest thereon, and is ordinarily
revocable at the will of the licenser... The permission by competent
authority to do an act which, without such permission, would be illegal, a
trespass, a tort, or otherwise not allowable. Leave to do thing which
licenser could prevent. Permission to do a particular thing, to exercise a
certain privilege or carry on a particular business or to pursue a certain
A permit granted by an appropriate governmental body, generally for a
consideration, to a person, firm or corporation to pursue some occupation or
to carry on some business subject to regulation under the police power. A
license is not a contract between the state and the licensee, but is a mere
A permit to use the streets is a mere permit revocable at pleasure. The
privilege of using the streets and highways by the operation thereon by
motor carriers for hire can be acquired only by permission or license from
the state or its political subdivisions. (Emphasis added) BLACKS LAW
DICTIONARY, 4th EDITION
Given the above DEFINITIONS, WHY would some need to be LICENSED unless the
SPECIFIC ACTIVITY was one which was subject to regulation under the police
power & DESIGNATED so in law?
PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE 5352. The use of the public highways for the
transportation of passengers for compensation is a business affected with a
public interest. It is the purpose of this chapter to preserve for the
public full benefit and use of public highways consistent with the needs of
commerce without unnecessary congestion or wear and tear upon the highways;
to secure to the people adequate and dependable transportation by carriers
operating upon the highways; to secure full and unrestricted flow of traffic
by motor carriers over the highways which will adequately meet reasonable
public demands by providing for the regulation of all transportation
agencies with respect to accident indemnity so that adequate and dependable
service by all necessary transportation agencies shall be maintained and the
full use of the highways preserved to the public; and to promote carrier and
public safety through its safety enforcement regulations.
So why would anyone today need a MARRIAGE LICENSE unless they planned on
marrying a BLOOD RELATIVE such as a brother, sister or first cousin?
Of course if someone wants the STATE to be a PARTY to the contract between a
HUSBAND & WIFE and for the STATE to have a say in the FRUITS (children,
assets, etc.) of the MARRIAGE, then getting a marriage license would be a
This state is a party to every marriage contract of its own residents as
well as the guardian of their morals. Roberts v. Roberts, 81 Cal.App.2d
That is if you like having a PARTNER who CONTRIBUTES nothing and can tell
you what to do.
"When two people decide to get married, they are required to first procure a
license from the State. If they have children of this marriage, they are
required by the State to submit their children to certain things, such as
school attendance and vaccinations. Furthermore, if at some time in the
future the couple decides the marriage is not working, they must petition
the State for a divorce. Marriage is a three-party contract between the man,
the woman, and the State. West v. West, 689 N.E.2d 1215 (1998)
And WHAT IF the STATE says NO? After all IF the STATE can GRANT permission
to marry, CANT it also WITHHOLD it?
Could this scenario happen one day in America?
Social services 'to take baby from teenager deemed too stupid to marry'
A mother-to-be, who was banned from marrying after social workers said she
is not intelligent enough, is to have her baby taken away immediately after
Kerry Robertson, 17, who has mild learning difficulties, has been told that
she will not be allowed to bring up her own child, who she has already named
Last month Miss Robertson was prevented from marrying her fiancé Mark
McDougall, 25, after council officials claimed that she did not understand
the implications of getting married.
She has now been warned that she will only be allowed a few hours with her
baby, which is due in January, before it is taken into foster care.
After hearing the news, Miss Robertson, of Dunfermline, Fife, who is 26
weeks pregnant, said: I couldn't believe it. I am so upset I can't stop
Mr McDougall, an artist, said he wants to take on full responsibility for
his son but claims that he is powerless because he is not married to Miss
He added: Social Services are ruining our lives. As we are not married
because social workers would not let us marry it seems I have no rights as
a dad at all.
Two days before the ceremony, two social workers visited their flat and told
them that the marriage was illegal because of Miss Robertsons learning
The service and reception for 20 guests had to be called off despite the
couple having already bought rings and a wedding dress.
At the time, Miss Robertson said: I know what marriage is. It is when two
folks want to spend the rest of their lives together. I love Mark and I want
to get married to him.
Mr McDougall added: Despite arguing that we loved one another and didn't
want our baby to be born to unwed parents, they would not budge. It's a
He claims that social services have exaggerated the extent of Miss
Robertsons learning difficulties and that she is hoping to go back to
college to catch up academically.
In May it was disclosed that Rachel Pullen, 24, had her three-year-old
daughter taken away from her by social services when she was six months old
after Nottingham City Council officials deemed her too stupid to look after
Patrick in California
"It ain't what ya don't know that hurts ya. What really puts a hurtin' on ya
is what ya knows for sure, that just ain't so." -- Uncle Remus
--- In email@example.com, Fred Marshall <fredm07@...> wrote:
>When couples obtain
> a marriage license (license being permission to do that which is
> otherwise illegal), they unknowingly enter into a contract with the
> state, essentially marrying the state, in a sense. Because the state
> becomes a party to the marriage (legal polygamy, sort of), it also has
> legal interest in whatever is produced by the marriage, i.e. children.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>