- Apr 3, 2007How naive to believe that your paper work as correct
as it may be to invoke a valid oaths and Art III court
setting, without some way to make ignoring it more penalizing
to 'judges' than collecting their awards for steamrollering
over you as usual. Reviewing various private legal lists
over last decade+, 99.99% is on what to do after one
injustice after another is done.
Flag and law arguments are basically valid,
having seen my spouse shock a Texas Circuit Ct
room and resist being made to cross the BAR to testify
against a friend charged with practising law without a license,
after being attached and forced into court room,
by staying seated in gallery, stating "I come under
flag of peace on the land of the united States of America,
displaying peace flag, adding and this is my foreign law
as she held up her Bible, that prohibits me from crossing
the BAR into the court's arena." The judge agreed she was
right as jaws dropped but then the defendant crossed the
BAR to represent himself and was found guilty : (
Court above didn't need her presence to get what they
wanted so don't expect this to work if you're the defendant.
Definitely worth mentioning in affidavits but not enough
firm ground to stand on alone.
Spend more efforts on judgement proofing before assets in
a pinch next time. After first court fraud done to you, you
end up in rapid expansion of more and more paper and
officials to try to force back in line with nil to risk
while you sweat bullets holes leaking out life reserves.
- << Previous post in topic