Re: Women & Music
> I'm happy to look through my collection to see what I can shareI'm sorry you interpret everything I write in the worst possible way all
>with you... but I don't think I have to prove anything to you... You make
>it sound like the idea that women can create beautiful, worthwhile music
>is a dangerously radical one that must be backed up by as much proof as
>possible...Thats the sort of sexist crap that makes my head spin....
I know women can ( and do ) produce great music so you don't have to prove
that. I only wanted to get tuned on to some new great music.
A somewhat insulted Anders.
- On Sun, 31 May 1998, Oeivind Idsoe wrote:
> not it comes from male or female is, for me, not really relevant. Of course
> more women were on the list, as they often represent a different position and
> on things altogether, which is very refreshing, but why aren't they here? You
> mention things being "extremely sexist" as one reason, which contradicts all
> mailing-list experiences during the last few years. I've been on lists where
> are a definite minority, but this has never been "used against them" and
> never been harassed in any way (at least not publically (some idiots can onlybe
> "tough" in private, you know)).I was referring more to the "serious" music scene being sexist
than this list... One of the reasons I love music related mailing lists is
that I can discuss music without getting all the crap that so often occurs
in RL situations.... In my experience, a lot of women are put off the
"serious" scene because they feel really unwelcome, but they love the
music... So they wouldn't consider subscribing to this list, because
they think it will just be the same old story....Sad, but thats the
way it is...Thats the reason why I try to agitate for change! Its just
*so* offputting going to "serious" shops sometimes I just don't bother....
And I'm a fifth generation feminist and not exactly a shrinking violet (as
you may have noticed! ;-)). Its a shame, because I love stuff on the Chain
Reaction label (Monolake have been on my walkman often recently, and I
find they make an excellent soundtrack for London Commuting! Fabulous
stuff... I strongly reccommend their album "Hong Kong"... ambient
recordings of Hong Kong and mainland Chinese cities morphed into sinous
graceful techno... ), for example, and its often is hard to find in the
Mainstream Alternative shops I feel more comfortable in... and yes, I do a
lot of mail order as well! (much more than I should, considering I'm a
perpetually broke PhD student;-))
> > so why do they avoid the "serious" music scene?pretentious
> I have no idea. Perhaps, and with good reason!, they don't like the
> attitude of "serious musicians" or "serious music listeners", and seldom feelI often find pretentious musicians exceptionally hilarious and a
> music is a question of life and death? Some men seem willing to die for their
> convictions -- "if the rest of the world doesn't listen to Artist X something
> really, really bad will happen" -- and I don't believe women are buying this.
bottomless source of amusement.... Anyone remember that F.S.O.L. Invisible
Jukebox? *Still* has me in stitches....:-)
> > I *well* remember the creep who tried to refuse tonice,
> > sell me the tuner I wanted on the grounds that it was grey, and therefore
> > wouldn't colour co-ordinate with my other equipment... Mmmmmm.... I nearly
> > bit his head off.
> But, hey, does one creep make us all creeps? I hope not! Some of us *are*
> youYeah, I know.... Its just that these experiences do tend to
> know. Or at least trying to be.
rankle! I try not to be bitter, but after lots of nasty experiences you do
tend to get a bit defensive, if you know what I mean... Since that awful
afternoon ( I was really upset by that creep ) I've found a chain
of retailers in the UK that has a policy of being non-patronising to
women... they're called Richer Sounds, if anyone's interested, and I now
buy all my hi-fi equipment there... Its *so* refreshing to walk into one
of their shops and not be treated like a half wit! THey're very good value
as well... *and* they do second hand stuff as well as new.... Worth
looking out for!
> > And I bet you that if
> > the techno-bods got over their deep fear of women (having two x
> > chromosomes isn't contagious, you know...) you would start to see many
> > more women happily fiddling with composition software....
> You are saying "...the techno bods...", and then "...you would start...", so I
> you are including me in your category of "women-hating/fearing" men, which
No I wasn't actually, though that sentence is rather ambiguous,
sorry. The grammatically correct word in the phrase "you would start" is
"ONE would start" but like most Brits, I hate using the pronoun ONE
because it makes you/one sound like an inbred halfwitted aristocrat! One
has no wish to do Prince Charles impersonations... Serious Techno Bods in
general *do* have a serious problem with women getting into their music,
I've noticed, but, of course there are always exceptions.... I'm glad to
have met one! (<giggle> there's that word again, isn't the English
> Because if things were *that* explicit, they probably wouldn't be so difficultperhaps
> solve. Power operates in mysterious ways (like Foucault has shown), and
> often on a micro-level rather than operating through a simple "No!".
> (How about those wonderful chaps, Deleuze&Guattari: "Woman: we all have to
> that, whether we are male or female." (see pages 469-471 in A Thousand
> forI agree there are many subtlties in the interaction between
> the specifics concerning women (and non-whites) and the "Apparatus Of Capture"
> it's brilliant).
genders, things are never black or white, but I also argue that there are
many instances of unsubtle oppression. A century of campaigning in the
West has meant that these are less common than they once were, but there
are still plenty to go around! Things have improved for female
musicians/composers... they now get merely ignored, which is a lot better
than being forbidden to compose or having to put your works out under a
man's name, but it still sucks....
- On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Anders Dahl wrote:
> From: Anders Dahl <anders@...>Well, I'm sorry if you didn't mean to be insulting, but *I* was
> > I'm happy to look through my collection to see what I can share
> >with you... but I don't think I have to prove anything to you... You make
> >it sound like the idea that women can create beautiful, worthwhile music
> >is a dangerously radical one that must be backed up by as much proof as
> >possible...Thats the sort of sexist crap that makes my head spin....
> > Anna
> I'm sorry you interpret everything I write in the worst possible way all
> the time.
> I know women can ( and do ) produce great music so you don't have to prove
> that. I only wanted to get tuned on to some new great music.
> A somewhat insulted Anders.
insulted when I wrote that email... I hate having to prove to people that
women can do this or that... you'd think it wouldn't be necessary any
more, but it still is, sometimes, & it pisses me off! Its *unbelievably*
depressing to have to fight the same battles my great great grandmother
Maud had to fight... I'm working on another annotated list to share with
you all, but it will probably take a week or more as I'm hideously busy at
the mo'.... so much so that I may even be <gasp> off line for a while....
- Anna Clare McDuff wrote:
>Rough Trade almost always have a wide range of CR stuff, as you doubtless
> you may have noticed! ;-)). Its a shame, because I love stuff on the Chain
> Reaction label (Monolake have been on my walkman often recently, and I
> find they make an excellent soundtrack for London Commuting! Fabulous
> stuff... I strongly reccommend their album "Hong Kong"... ambient
> recordings of Hong Kong and mainland Chinese cities morphed into sinous
> graceful techno... ), for example, and its often is hard to find in the
> Mainstream Alternative shops I feel more comfortable in... and yes, I do a
> lot of mail order as well! (much more than I should, considering I'm a
> perpetually broke PhD student;-))
know :). I second the Monolake recommendation, by the way - one of my
favourite recent records, and probably the easiest way into the Chain
Reaction aesthetic (are there any clubs where this stuff actually gets
played loud?). I found the latest CD (Substance) a bit disappointing,
My one facile contribution to the women and hi-fi shops debate: I find it
very annoying how people in hi-fi shops assume you know exactly what
you're after because you're a man. :) I know sweet f.a. about my hi-fi,
and regard even the fact that it works with religious awe, so I wish
hi-fi shop people would funnel some patronisation my way. Maybe drag.
Thanks for the info re. improv, by the way. I work in london though don't
live in it. I do know there's a kind of mini-festival going on at the
moment, so when my paycheque comes through this month I'll investigate
(Evan Parker is playing soon, and since he's a name I recognise, he might
be a good place to start.)
- Hello :)
RE: the recent discussion about Women & Music.
I've just been talking to Phil Earle who runs Law & Auder records (see
the latest Wire (172) : the subscription offer) And one of his up &
coming CD comps is a Women Only Electronica Compilation, (he likes these
themed things!), he's already got quite a lot a tracks but if you know
of any female electronic artists that might be interested then you can
drop him a line at:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * + * * * *