Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: theos-talk to govert: reading two books meade and caldwell

Expand Messages
  • Govert Schuller
    Any of these accounts will have to be thoroughly contextualized to assess any issues of integrity, consistency, alternate explanations, etc. which might come
    Message 1 of 4 , Jan 28, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      Any of these accounts will have to be thoroughly contextualized to assess
      any issues of integrity, consistency, alternate explanations, etc. which
      might come into play. These reports by themselves are not sufficient. Of
      course that applies to the Coulombs and Hodgson too.



      From: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com [mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com] On
      Behalf Of Daniel
      Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:18 PM
      To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: theos-talk to govert: reading two books meade and caldwell





      govert,

      when i was working on my book Esoteric world of madame blavatsky, i
      especially on purpose included much relevant material which meade had
      completely ignored in her book or had downplayed and hardly mentioned. so if
      anything one should read the meade book comparing and contrasting it with my
      book.

      and in my book i on purpose included coulombs and hodgsons accounts on the
      mahatmas so that the perceptive reader could compare and contrast what they
      said withthe accounts of witnesses who testified they had seen and
      encountered the mahatmas.

      on my website i even include the testimony of coulomb and hodgson. see
      http://blavatskyarchives.com/coulombandhodgson.htm

      compare and contrast their accounts with for example olcott's accounts:
      http://blavatskyarchives.com/olcottandmahatmas.htm

      what would a historian or a member of a jury conclude by reading, studying
      and anlyzing these accounts?

      food for thought.

      daniel
      http://hpb.cc



      No virus found in this message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4756 - Release Date: 01/20/12



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.