Re: Theos-World Frank and the examples of the four lineages: Clarification needed
- Daniel, quick response as I have to leave
home now, I'll coming back to it later, after
I have puzzled out what your answer means.
At the first moment I am not quite sure,
whether you are trying to fool me with
Or is my English so bad that my logic
argument comes not through?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 6:11 AM
Subject: Theos-World Frank and the examples
of the four lineages: Clarification needed
In the Adyar Theosophical Society, we have
the following lineage:
Blavatsky -> Besant & Leadbeater -> ????
In the Point Loma Theosophical Society, the
Blavatsky -> Judge -> Tingley -> de
Purucker -> ????
In the United Lodge of Theosophists:
Blavatsky -> Judge -> Crosbie -> ????
In the Arcane School:
Blavatsky -> Bailey -> ????
But you write:
"....each theosophical lineage as each
something in it that is worth...."
"....I believe that each lineage has is worth
its own plane, so long as the light shines
"...no single lineage - as I here and than
theos-talk - has the whole truth and not each
lineage has the same portion in quantity and
quality of the uncorrupted original
But Frank I think you are here changing the
"issue" or THE POINT
I was NOT referring to what lineage has "the
whole truth" or
what lineage has the greater "portion" of the
teaching" or even the "worth" of each
The issue was different.
Do you believe Besant and Leadbeater were
genuine occult successors and that this Adyar
therefore is "true and genuine"?
Or do you believe Crosbie was the real
to Judge? In other words, NOT Tingley and de
therefore that the ULT lineage is the true
and genuine thing?
Or do you believe Bailey was the next legit
Frank, are you saying that you believe ALL
3 above mentioned lineages are "true and
genuine" in some way?
Or do you believe that the real occult
and history was as follows?
that WQJ was the true occult successor of
HPB, & Tingley was in turn the chosen
"successor" to WQJ, and
Purucker followed in the "esoteric footsteps"
Therefore, is my description below so way off
base or inaccurate?
"Frank Reitemeyer is a strong and vocal
advocate that promotes the
Blavatsky-Judge-Tingley-de Purucker line of
succession. He has no
doubt whatsoever that this lineage is the
true and genuine one. He
is equally convinced that Leadbeater was
nothing but a "swindler",
Hoping for clarification.
Yahoo! Groups Links