Dallas: the ULT insists on using and providing for study, only the ORIGINALS..
- Dallas once wrote on this forum:
"As far as I can see, that's why the U L T insists
on using and providing for study, only the ORIGINALS --
I see too many interpretive changes in Theosophical
texts altered by those who have later claimed that
they can correct errors made in those 'originals.'
Who dares to say that they can do better than H P B
and the Masters who certified ( PATH Vol. 8, p. 1-3 )
to have co-edited the text of The SECRET DOCTRINE?"
So did the Theosophy Company in 1928 or W.Q. Judge in the
1890s claim that "they can correct errors made in those
'originals'", that is in the original of HPB's VOICE?
Did the Theosophy Company or Mr. Judge dare to say
"that they can do better than H P B. and the
I believe Dallas was directing his strong language
towards Besant, Mead and de Zirkoff and their "editing"
of HPB's originals but if it is valid to question
those three people, why not the Theosophy Company and