62205Re: theos-talk Policy of theosophical websites to stifle discussion
- Jun 20, 2014Today, we are living in Information world where everyone is kept abreast of happenings. Do not we want our TS members around the world to be kept uptodate on a timely manner?
I am sure many members would appreciate efforts by TS to treat them as valuable members and keep them posted of all important happenings. Long time growth of all organizations including TS depend on members who are fired up with enthusiasm to spread theosophical verities which would definitely help the current world where there is strife everywhere and hurting our brothers and sisters.
As I have mentioned before, TS should start delivering all important breaking info to their members much like what theos-talk does. This needs to be done on round the clock and as old news is stale news. With Internet, we can do it. But it needs committed people who are not working on 9-5 work schedule.
We all know there is very competent experienced computer talent available within the General Council and all it needs to tap their help. It is there for asking. Is the GC willing to take the challenge and move quickly?
Independent Theosophical Forums on Internet is essential because many times we see information and critique not to the liking of TS leaders. Like the story of emperor without clothes came out because of a child, looking from outside can reveal issues which are of great importance but is not obvious to the organizational leaders.
We are all fortunate that at least there are few independent sites such as theos-talk is there to help prevent TS leaders taking wrong decisions and with the potential to prevent TS going down.
Let us hope and pray we will see better days tomorrow.MKROn Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Sampsa Kuukasjärvi sampsa.kuukasjarvi@... [theos-talk] <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:I agree that there should be the free flow of information, in as many places as possible. Discussion is easier if the sites are independent on those organizations that are discussed.
More info on TS sites would mean more openness to the TS, and credibility and legitimity to leaders. Now if there is no official info available, we start pondering whether some people has something to hide from ordinary members. Unfortunately, that seems to be the case sometimes.However, I understand very well that all Theosophists are not at all interested in organizational matters. They don't have to be.
Like Jeff said, we live in the real world. So it is useful to know about the current events, not only about authors and leaders of the late 1800's. It is said that what happens in the TS, is symbolically and occultly very important to the outer world.2014-06-19 22:33 GMT+03:00 Carlos Cabral cabralyc@... [theos-talk] <email@example.com>:
Websites of TS Sections MUST include the whole aspects of OUR organization, including what is going on in regard to the past elections, which is not "politics", but VERY IMPORTANT issues regarding people in charge of the Presidency of our Society.
From: jeffndc jeffndc@... [theos-talk] <firstname.lastname@example.org>;
To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>;
Subject: theos-talk Policy of theosophical websites to stifle discussion
Sent: Thu, Jun 19, 2014 7:24:58 PMIn light of the continuing turmoil within the Theosophical Society Adyar over election irregularities and the General Council's policy of silence, with few exceptions, whats really disturbing is how the so-called Theosophical websites have completely stifled any mention of the election irregularities. When I have tried to post even the most "informational" messages with references, they get deleted. Moderators claim that these issues are "political" and of course they are above all that.Well l say that if that is the case, they Should not allow postings of HPB, Sennet, Bessant, Judge or all the rest because Theosophy, in addition to its AIMS, is also a part of the real world. I feel that there is an overarching tendency of some theosophists to sort themselves among their peers as "elites" and everyone else--in the case of the TS Adyar, the "ballast". Our pursuit of knowledge of the Greater realms in the universe and how we are to navigate them and each other must be Among supported and Encouraged by worldly Institutions, flaws and all. We Should not expect our Institutions to be without flaws, but flaws when repeatedly occur and are illuminated, yet ignored, what recourse do we have but to try to inform and educate those interested in Theosophy?Those who manage and moderate the various discussions online Should be Among the Most Liberal in Allowing free discussion on Both the single and esoteric pursuits of theosophist, But Also the Organizations and institutions. Ruling out Such information is a tragedy for universal knowledge and evolution. There ought not to be anything but the free flow of information, and let those who will be educated and respond as they see fit. How do others feel?Jeff
- << Previous post in topic