Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [thefixedstars] Re: Orbs (i.e. moiety)

Expand Messages
  • Mark Andrew Holmes
    ... Like I said above: But Mars ... The Manubrium aspect didn t show when I used the file named brady.fst for the fixed-star report, but it did when I used
    Message 1 of 4 , Mar 2 12:36 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      --- betelgeuse <betelggeuse@...> wrote:

      > hi,
      >
      > >>Okay, I get it now. I was reading the aspects off
      > the >Brady fixed-stars file in my copy of Solar
      > Fire 5. >>Manubrium isn't in it. I have another
      > file that I >custom-compiled for myself and
      > Manubrium got left off >that one somehow. But Mars
      > conjunct Manubrium (and also >Vega and Ascella)
      > showed up when I called up another >report based on
      > the entire fixed-star list that came >with
      > SolarFire.
      >
      > >Mark A. Holmes >>>>>>>>>
      >
      >
      > Manubrium is now 15 cap 03', so 39' from Mars of the
      > group, as
      > shown at the 2nd part of the star report that I sent
      > and was uploaded
      > to the group files. If it does not show at SF5,
      > then the SF4 list is
      > greater than the 5, or the star changed name.
      >

      Like I said above:

      But Mars
      > conjunct Manubrium (and also >Vega and Ascella)
      > showed up when I called up another >report based on
      > the entire fixed-star list that came >with
      > SolarFire.


      The Manubrium aspect didn't show when I used the file
      named brady.fst for the fixed-star report, but it did
      when I used starfile.fst, which is the whole slate of
      stars available with my copy of SF5.

      Mark A. Holmes




      __________________________________
      Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
      Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
      http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.