56906.12.13: No Regret | The Goat Who Laughed, Wept, Spoke & Died | Do You Catch Yourself Red-Handed? | Half-Assed Bridge
- Dec 5, 2013Quote: No Regret
My religion is– Comment | More
to live and die
TDE Web Store Is Open Realisation: The Goat Who Laughed, Wept, Spoke & Died According to the Matakabhatta Jataka, when the Buddha was in Jetavana, some monks asked if there was any benefit in sacrificing animals as offerings for the departed, to which he replied that no good ever comes from such killing. As he recalled, a long time ago, when Brahmadatta ruled Varanasi, a brahmin wanted to offer a 'feast for the deceased'. He bought a sacrificial goat and asked his disciples to bathe him by the river, before grooming, adorning and feeding him. While doing so, he began to laugh with the sound of a pot smashing, before weeping just as suddenly. Amazed at this, they asked him for the reasons for the strange behaviour. The goat requested that they repeat the question when they return to their teacher, to whom they hurried back and recollected what happened. The master thus personally asked the goat why he laughed and wept.
The goat replied that in the past, he too was a brahmin, who taught the Vedas, and sacrificed a goat for a 'feast for the deceased'. Having killed that one goat, he have had his head severed 499 times. He laughed aloud as he realised this would be his last life as a sacrificial animal, after which he would be free from such misery. Yet, he also wept – out of empathy as he realised that due to killing him, the brahmin too may lose his head 500 times. Hearing this, the brahmin announced that he will not kill him. However, the goat exclaimed that whether he kills him or not, he could not escape death that day. To that, the brahmin asked him not to worry, as he would protect him. The goat replied that such protection is weak, while the force of his negative karma is strong. Still determined, the brahmin ordered his disciples not to let anyone harm the goat. While grazing under the disciples' supervision, he stretched his neck to reach the leaves on a bush near the top of a rock.
There and then, out of the blue, a bolt of lightning struck the rock. A sharp sliver chipped off and flew through the air… before cleanly cutting off the goat's head! A crowd gathered and began to discuss excitedly about the amazing incident. Having witnessed it all, a tree deva (terrestrial god) told everyone that if only they knew such horrible karmic effects of being reborn into sorrow, they would cease from killing. Wary of such hellish retribution, they gave up their traditional sacrificing of animals entirely. He also further instructed on observation of the moral precepts and encouraged them to do good. Faithfully doing so for several generations, they lived charitably and had favourable rebirths. The Buddha then revealed that the deva was himself as a Bodhisattva. Just as the deva was no ordinary god, the wise talking goat was probably a skilful teaching Bodhisattva too?
Unrepented negative karma created can have its effects magnified, though new positive karma repentantly created has mitigating effects too. Having fallen into the lower realms of hell-beings, hungry ghosts and animals, it is seldom easy to exit, with many rebirths there until the corresponding karma depletes. Although the lightning seemed like an 'accident', it was the deliberation of the law of karma exacting through nature. When conditions are ripe, karma finds its way! The Buddha also taught that it is much nobler to sacrifice one's harmful spiritual defilements than others' precious lives. In the Ksitigarbha Sutra, it was advised that to relieve suffering and facilitate better rebirths, merits for sharing with the recently deceased should be created by making meat-free offerings to the Buddha and monastics [before the deceased, during funerals and for at least 49 days, during which rebirth can occur]. Those who do so, and go vegetarian or (even more ideally) vegan personally, even if only for this period will receive much blessings too.
Instead of ending others' physical lives,
Bodhisattvas facilitate the beginning
and furthering of their spiritual lives.
– Stonepeace | Get Books
The Best Sacrifice
Offering Of Greater Kindness
Share Articles: tde@... Excerpt: Do You Catch Yourself Red-Handed?
Group spiritual practice is crucial,
in case you lack mindful discipline
and do not know this is the case.
Geshe Ben was an erudite and accomplished monk of the Oral Precept School who lived in the eleventh century. He was noted for his rigorous ethical training and conscientiousness in adhering to the altruism of the Bodhisattva, the awakening Mahayana practitioner.
Wandering in search of alms one day, the young monk Ben was invited into the home of a devout couple. While the faithful householders went out of the room to prepare some food for the poor mendicant, Ben suddenly awoke – as if from a reverie – to find himself with his hand in the cookie jar, as if it were, pinching some delectable tea for himself from a sack in one corner. There he was, caught red-handed – if only by his own meticulous conscience.
Shouting, 'Thief, thief!' Ben created such an uproar that the entire family came running, makeshift weapons in hand. To their amazement and relief, they beheld the novice accusing himself of pilfering and threatening to cut off his offending hand at once if it ever acted so disgracefully again. Thusthe novice met his inner guru, the innate integrity of wisdom itself, from whom he was never thereafter parted.
The Snow Lion's Turquoise Mane: Wisdom Tales From Tibet Links
'The Grandmaster' Regrets
Share Articles: tde@...
Events & Notices See http://thedailyenlightenment.com/category/06 for faster & latest news To subscribe to the above, email email@example.com TDE-Weekly is a free independent Buddhist inspiration e-newsletter. You can support us by contributing news, articles, running costs and encouraging friends to join. Change (and cancellation) of emails, contributions, suggestions and queries are welcomed at tde@.... The information within the articles need not represent TDE's views.The copyrights of the articles belong to the authors.