2868Re: [the boredoms] LIVE At Sunflancisco
- Dec 26, 2007How long does the DVD run? In the past, at least, it seemed as if the
group was under-represented in music video and official concert video
output, very odd for a group with such visual qualities. I haven't
seen the video described here, but the "blurs" (though likely
deliberate) also sound like partly a side-effect of certain digital
video transcoding errors, where dark scenes or scenes that fade to
black leave a weird artifact-type smear on the screen instead of just
fading properly from light to dark. It's been years now, and I'm
still waiting for this digital flaw to be corrected; if anyone can
explain why it's never been corrected, can that be explained, too?
It's especially evident in certain TV broadcasts. Transfers of old
videotape show this flaw readily. VH-1 Classics ran some early MTV
broadcasts awhile ago, but instead of using tape, or a propely-coded
transfer from tape, they had these gritty-looking bad transcodings
that looked like they were done by an amateur, with the same sort of
digital flaws (weird fades, dropped frames, smearing, etc.). --- In
email@example.com, exfedex2000 <no_reply@...> wrote:
> The audio is really good as far as I can tell so far. I watched it
> the PC because of the region coding mess. I won't be able to see itperfect
> on the TV until I dupe a copy without the region code.
> It's one camera sort of above and behind Yoshimi. Really the
> spot but too much in the way of blurred zoom ins and overall blurpick
> effect throughout. The entire opening with Eye and the glowing hand
> orbs is a complete wash. You can't see much at all and I'm guessing
> it was because he does it in the dark. The cam probably couldn't
> up on it very well.wrote:
> The CD is the REAL rip-off. Two new drum tracks totaling 19 minutes
> or so. This was obriously a DVD release with a bonus CD, not the
> other way around which is what I thought it was.
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Keith Rankin <keithkawaii@>
> > How is the audio? Are there any parts where its on point as far as
> the footage?
> > exfedex2000 <email@example.com>
> Well, it's not the most professionally shot video you'll seeI kept
> but at
> > least it's something. The blur effect is absolutely annoying!
> > thinking; "Can't we just see this the way it was seen by thepeople
> > that were there?" Psychedelic effect be damned! But as I saidabove,
> > I'm grateful this even exists!
> > ---------------------------------
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>