Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Do early papyri line up with NA27 in John 18:29-39?

Expand Messages
  • Daniel Buck
    [This is a continuation of a discussion of p52 from another list, posted at textualcritcism for Bob Relyea s benefit] In TC-Alternate-list, Daniel Buck wrote:
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 22, 2012
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      [This is a continuation of a discussion of p52 from another list, posted at textualcritcism for Bob Relyea's benefit]

      In TC-Alternate-list, Daniel Buck wrote:
      <<But that extra E in PEILATOS isn't the only startling evidence we see in these four papyri.When we look at the variant units in this passage, we often see a split between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus--a total of 25 Sinaiticus-Vaticanus splits in 10 consecutive verses.  >>
       
      Leaving out the unique p52 variants already discussed, let's see how the papyri and other early codices line up with NA27 (or not):
       
      v. 29 ο πιλατος εξω προς αυτους 03c NA27 [ο]πειλατος π. α. εξω και φησιν p66 vs οπειλατος π. α. και ειπεν 02 vs  π. α. οπιλατος εξω και φησιν  01 vs ο πειλατος εξω π. α. και φησιν  03*; all vs NA for v. 29.
      p60 lends no voice here. 02 & 05 read Byz on both variants; εξω και in p66 01 N f13 579 l253 l844. 05 here is a Byz supplement to Codex Bezae;
      v. 30 ειπαν 01 03 NA27 ειπον 02; κακονποιησας 01* vs κακονποιων 01c 03 NA27  κακον[π.] p66 could be κακονποιησας 01* or κακονποιων 03; κακοποιος 02, 04c, 05; κακοποιων 04*
      v. 31πιλατος  p60 01 03c NA27πειλατος  02, 03* p66; ειπον 01* p66 vs αυτον ειπον 01c 02 03 NA27; all vs NA for v. 31
      v. 32 σημαινων 01* vs  ον ειπεν σημαινων 01c 03 NA27 (ειπεν extant in p52 p60);ποι 02 vs ποιω 01 03 NA27
      v. 33 εις τοπραιτωριονπαλιν 01 vs παλιν εις τοπραιτωριον 03, NA27;πιλατος 01 03c NA27πειλατος p66 02 03*; all vs NA for v. 33
      v. 34 απεκριθη ο p60 vs απεκρινατο p66 vs απεκριθη αυτω ο 01 Byz vs απεκριθη 03, NA27 vs απεκρινατο ο 02; απο σεαυτου p66 01 03 NA27 vs. αφ εαυτου 02; τουτο p60 p66* 01* vs συ τουτο  p66c 01c 03 NA27 . . . followed by ειπας  01* vs  λεγεις p66 01c 02 03 NA27
      v. 35πιλατος 01 03c NA27 vsπειλατος p66 02 03*; μητι p60 01c 02 03 NA27 vs μη 01* vs μη γαρ p66; ο αρχιερευς 01* vs οι αρχιερεις 01c 03 NA27; all vs. NA for v. 35
      v. 36 εμη βασιλεια 01 vs β. η εμη 03 NA27 (all 3 places); ηγωνιζοντο 03* vs η. αν p60 p90 01 03c [NA27] vs αν . . . η. 02; all vs NA for v. 36
      v. 37 Pilate same split as v. 35 (but p60 lac.); συ ει p90 vs ει συ rel.; μαρτυρηση 01* vs μαρτυρησω rel.; περι της αληθειας 01* vs τη αληθεια  01c, 03, NA27; ων   01* vs ων εκ rel.; all vs NA for v. 37
      v. 38 Pilate same split as v. 37; ευρ

      (Message over 64 KB, truncated)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.