Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

RE: [textualcriticism] Mark 3:15 not in UBSGNT4 or TCGNT

Expand Messages
  • Wieland Willker
    The variant is covered in the online commentary. Here s what I wrote: The wording is not exactly as in the parallels. On the other hand there is no reason for
    Message 1 of 2 , Dec 29, 2011
      The variant is covered in the online commentary.
      Here's what I wrote:
      "The wording is not exactly as in the parallels. On the
      other hand there is no reason for an omission. The clause is
      supported by a variety of different sources. If it is not
      original it must have been arisen independently at different
      places."


      Best wishes
      Wieland
      <><
      --------------------------
      Wieland Willker, Bremen, Germany
      http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie
      Textcritical commentary:
      http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/TCG/

      Please check out the TC forum:
      http://tcg.iphpbb3.com
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.