Re: [textualcriticism] BXM: 001612 Theodosios of Kinsos
- Just out of curiosity, were the other stolen MS noted by Hoskier found also?Surrepti Vel Evanuerunt:HSK-175 [Absunt]HSK-195 [GA-1785]HSK-197 [GA-1424]HSK-198 [GA-1685] found AKA BXM: 001612HSK-199 [GA-1760]HSK-205 [GA-1806]Also, as a tertiary query, what of the GA numbers for the following? And, most being missing at the time of Hoskier, have they also been found?Hic non citati ; Neglectus Vel Delendi:Stephani Codex ις', 3, [Absunt]Codex Petavii Senatoris Parisiensis 2 (after Paulus Petavius) / Codex Petavianus Secundus, HSK-11, [Absunt]Manuscriptum 1795; Lückenhaft, HSK-129, [GA-1795 ┼ 2349]Manuscriptum 1857 Fragmento, HSK-131, [GA-1857]Manuscriptum 1870, HSK-133, [GA-1870]Manuscriptum 1872, HSK-134, [GA-1872]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-252, [Absunt]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-209vid, [Absunt]► Manuscriptum 1637 Abschrift Αντίγραφο (Daughter Copy), HSK-230a (abschrift) Daughter Copy of 230, [Absunt]Codex Vaticanus Beiblatt 1882; Vide: 1918, HSK-39supp (supplement), [GA-866b (beiblatt)]Manuscriptum 1668 Illegitima et Falso (Fake Servile Copy of Er. 3rd Ed.), HSK-235, [GA-1668]Codex Taurinensis, HSK-83, [GA-339]Codex Vaticanus 1976, HSK-116, [GA-2063]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-116, [Absunt]Manuscriptum 866, HSK-117, [GA-866]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-117, [Absunt]Manuscriptum 2072, HSK-168, [GA-2072]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-173, [Absunt]Manuscriptum Fragmento Hic Non Citati, HSK-183, [Absunt]Manuscriptum 1277, HSK-185, [GA-1277]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-225, [Absunt]Athos Lavrensis Θ' 152, HSK-231, [GA-1652]Manuscriptum 2114, HSK-234, [GA-2114]Manuscriptum 1776 (Some say Stephani Codex ιε'), HSK-237, [GA-1776]Manuscriptum 1777, HSK-238, [GA-1777]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-239, [Absunt]Manuscriptum 1903, HSK-243, [GA-1903]Manuscriptum 2136, HSK-247, [GA-2136]Manuscriptum Hic Non Citati, HSK-249, [Absunt]Thank you,RichardFrom: Daniel B. Wallace <csntm@...>
To: textualcriticism <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 1:07:18 PM
Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] BXM: 001612 Theodosios of KinsosCSNTM digitally photographed GA 1685 (aka BXM 01612) in May 2011. However, the Byzantine and Christian Museum does not permit us to post the images on our website. But scholars may visit our facilities to examine the photographs.
Daniel B. Wallace, PhD
Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts
----- Start Original Message -----
Sent: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 06:17:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Richard Andersen <richard.goodgrief@...>
To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] BXM: 001612 Theodosios of Kinsos
> Thanks All.Interesting... 1685 is one of only 10 mss with the combination of 4 Gospels & Rev (792, 1006, 1064, 1328, 1551, 1685, 2323, 2643, 2656, and 2794). I am able to see only one image of the manuscript... the canon tables at the front. Am I overlooking a link somewhere to see more images of it? I'm curious to look it over since I was recently examining 2643 (another XIII ms of the 4 Gospels & Rev) that's only a few miles from my house.
> The only link is to a one page scan... unfortunately.
> I hope you can see it and share... Thanks again to all for your comments... and for confirming what I was thinking.
> From: Jeff Cate <jjcate@...>
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2011 5:47:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] BXM: 001612 Theodosios of Kinsos
> Hi Richard,
>2011 at 7:04 AM, Richard Andersen <richard.goodgrief@...> wrote:
> Regarding the manuscript being stolen, Elliott's bibliography cites 4 sources on #1685... 2 of which wrote after Hoskier did in 1929:
> Schmid, Josef. Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Apokalypse-Textes (1955-56), pp. 44, 196-197.
> Spatharakis, I. Corpus of Dated Illuminated Greek Manuscripts (1981), nr 203, plates 369-70.
> Hope this is helpful,
> --Jeff Cate,
> Riverside, CA
> On Sat, Nov 5,
>href="mailto:textualcriticism%40yahoogroups.com" rel=nofollow target=_blank ymailto="mailto:textualcriticism%40yahoogroups.com">email@example.com
> >Thats what I was thinking, but Hoisker has it listed as:
> >STOLEN:I understand from Dr. Bolides of Athens, that during the late war the Bulgarians (or their German officers) made away with all these MSS and they have doubless been sold after obliteration of Library marks, and may not easily be identified.
> >Tischendorf et all. also left blank due to this.
> >So, then am I to assume that this is the stolen MS found again?
> >From: Bill Warren <WFWarren@...>
> >Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2011 9:48:18 PMtarget=_blank>http://www.byzantinemuseum.gr/en/collections/manuscripts/?bxm=1612Could anyone tell me the Gregory number for this MS? Year: 1292Dimensions (cm): 22,5 x 16Provenance: St John the Baptist Monastery, SerresCreator: Theodosios of KinsosThe exact date of the codex (1292) is accompanied by the name of the scribe, the monk Theodosios of Kinsos. The exceptionally high quality of the text corresponds to the fine execution of the miniatures. There are canon tables on ff 5v-6r which give concordances between the gospels.
> >Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] BXM: 001612 Theodosios of Kinsos
> >The most likely candidate would seem to be MS 1685 based on the KL. That would be a parchment MS of the Gospels and Rev., so the info fits what is on the website from the BXM.
> >Gracia y paz, Bill Warren, Ph.D.Director of the Center for New Testament Textual StudiesLandrum P. Leavell, II, Professor of New Testament and GreekNew Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
> >On Nov 4, 2011, at 7:34 PM, richard.good... wrote:
----- End Original Message -----