RE: [textualcriticism] Re: Codex Vaticanus and the Rheims New Testament
> And there are umlauts alongside Jn. 7:39 in B. Hmm.I am wondering when Peter will come out of the closet. If I
remember correctly he said that he has solved the umlauts
Wieland Willker, Bremen, Germany
- That is correct. See p, 21 of Lucas, Notat., 1580:
Have mind: as far as I know the Greek NT with Werner's (ms) collations from the Vaticanus disappeared. Lucas mentioned ca 20 instances.
Teunis van Lopik
--- In email@example.com, "james_snapp_jr" <voxverax@...> wrote:
> Just double-checking for double-checking's sake: the line of descent appears to go like this:
> (1) Werner of Nimwegen made a collation of the NT portion of Codex Vaticanus, and this included information about the reading of B at John 7:39.
> (2) Lucas Brugensis consulted the collation that Werner of Nimwegen had made and mentioned some of its more interesting points in his 1580 Annotations.
> (3) The producers of the Rheims NT consulted Lucas Brugensis' Annotations, and the Rheims Preface-writer recollected Lucas Brugensis' note about the reading of Vaticanus at John 7:39.
> Is that correct?
> And there are umlauts alongside Jn. 7:39 in B. Hmm.
> Yours in Christ,
> James Snapp, Jr.