Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [textualcriticism] Mark 12.32 - TR and Sahidic Coptic?

Expand Messages
  • sarban
    ... From: schmuel To: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] Mark 12.32 - TR and Sahidic
    Message 1 of 9 , Aug 20 6:52 AM
    • 0 Attachment
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: schmuel
      Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:52 AM
      Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] Mark 12.32 - TR and Sahidic Coptic?

       

      Hi Folks,

      Thanks, Andrew

      Andrew

      The late form of the Latin Vulgate has Deus in Mark 12:32.

      Helpful, but leaves us a bit up in the air, as somebody reading this may infer that the Old Latin and the early Latin Vulgates did not have Deus. 

      Does anyone have an apparatus that would indicate the status of say the two dozen manuscripts in those lines that could be considered most early ?  Or even one dozen ?   The dozen or more Old Latin mss with the verse would be especially helpful, Fuldensis and Amiatinus would be good to know, and a few more Vulgate manuscripts.

      The lack of individual early Vulgate manuscripts is a big lack in the standard apparatus, imo.  And why a variant like this does not show the individual Old Latin manuscripts is a puzzle as well, as it does on a verse
       
       
      Hi Steven
       
      According to the Merk apparatus Deus is found in most the Old Latin (but not in k/bobiensis) but not in the early Vulgate (neither in Fuldensis nor in Amiatinus).
       
      Andrew Criddle
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.