Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Minuscules 252 and 464 on the Liste

Expand Messages
  • TeunisV
    1. 252 ID#30252 eap No Library listed 2. 252 ID#30252 e Russisches Staatsarchiv F. 1607, No. 5, Moscow 3. 464 ID#30252 ap Staatliches Historisches Museum V.
    Message 1 of 2 , Aug 16, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      1. 252 ID#30252 eap No Library listed
      2. 252 ID#30252 e Russisches Staatsarchiv F. 1607, No. 5, Moscow
      3. 464 ID#30252 ap Staatliches Historisches Museum V. 23, S. 341, Moscow
      Nr. 1 is the main decription and consists of the nr. 2 and 3 and therefore no library or nr of leaves is dated.
      Nr. 2 was formerly in Dresden, Sächs. Landesbibl. (Brought from Russia and afterward as war booty back?).

      For comparable solution of description and NT mss numbering, see e.g. Object ID's 30435; 30566; 30609.
      435: 285 leaves in the Universitätsbibliothek, Leiden and 576: 1 leaf in the library of the Duke of Norfolk, Arundel Castle (stolen?)

      566: 121 leaves in the Russische Nationalbibliothek, St. Petersburg and 2149: 1 leaf of the same manuscript in the same! library.

      Teunis van Lopik,
      Leidschendam, The Netherlands

      --- In textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com, "bucksburg" <bucksburg@...> wrote:
      >
      > The Liste at
      > http://intf.uni-muenster.de/vmr/NTVMR/ListeHandschriften.php
      > has an unusual entry for 252. Three mss are listed at that heading:
      252 ID#30252 eap No Library listed
      252 ID#30252 e Russisches Staatsarchiv F. 1607, No. 5, Moscow
      464 ID#30252 ap Staatliches Historisches Museum V. 23, S. 341, Moscow
      >
      > Now, there's noting untypical of a manuscript NT being in two volumes: Gospels in the first and Acts & Epistles in the second (which would rarely add Revelation); usually the thickness of a 1-volume NT would make it unmanageable. One notable exception, Aleph, has an unusually high number of columns and lines per page--but it's in so many pieces today, who's to say in how many volumes it was originally bound? But 252/464 is the first case of a 2-volume NT I have found in which the separately bound volumes are given separate GA-#'s.
      >
      > Or are they? Tommy Wasserman's collation of Jude uses 252(=[464]) as the citation number for text in the second volume. But neither 252 nor 464 are included on the Liste of Former GA Numbers. What gives?
      >
      > Daniel Buck
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.