Some problems of 579 in NA and IGNTP
- Here are some things I noted, while browsing the manuscript:
Mt 19:22 TON LOGON: Swanson has 579 correctly for the omission, against NA.
Lk 3:3 [THN] PERICWRON: 579 omits, this is not in NA, but in Swanson, IGNTP
Lk 6:43 PALIN: IGNTP has 579 wrongly for the omission, against NA, Swanson
Lk 7:11 EGENETO EN TW: txt not noted in NA, IGNTP has 579 wrongly for Byz.
Swanson and Schmidtke explicitly and NA implicitly have it for txt.
Lk 7:11 hIKANOI: NA does not list 579 for txt, but T&T, IGNTP, Swanson and
Schmidtke, which is correct.
Lk 9:37 TH EXHS HMERA: 579 omits HMERA. Noted in IGNTP, Swanson and
Schmidtke, but not in NA, where only the P45 reading is given.
Lk 17:12 ESTHSAN: 579 reads ANESTHSAN, this is not in NA, but in Swanson,
IGNTP and Schmidtke.
Jo 3:31 579 omits due to h.t. ESTIN (2) - ESTIN (3). So, implicitly, 579
could be counted for txt.
Jo 7:4 AUTOS: Swanson and Schmidtke have 579 correctly for txt, NA wrongly
for the P66* reading.
Jo 9:26 PALIN: NA and Schmidtke have 579 for txt. But it actually reads as
Swanson has it: EIPWN DE AUTW, TI EPOIHSEN PALIN; PWS EINEWXEN... This looks
like a wrongly inserted correction.
Jo 12:47 KAI MH FULAXH: Swanson and NA have wrongly 579 for the P66c
reading, against Schmidtke. Schmidtke is right. 579 reads: KAI EAN TIS MOU
*MH* AKOUSH TWN RHMATWN KAI FULAXH, EGW OU KRINW AUTON,
Wieland Willker, Bremen, Germany