Re: [textualcriticism] Mt 19:9b and Codex Z(035)
- Ken Rice wrote:<<I have been studying the variants here and noticed the UBS4 and NA27 are at odds
over Codex Z(035). UBS4 cites Z with no addition at the end of the verse while
NA27 shows it support Vaticanus' addition. Can anyone verify first, that I'm
reading the apparatus correctly and second, what does Z actually read (can it be
I am also wondering on what grounds was the addition omitted by UBS4 and NA27.>>Daniel Buck's reply:Apparently, the LaParola apparatus is based on that of UBS4. Going back to UBS2, which didn't cite Z:MOICATAI] Aleph C3 D L 1241MOICATAI KAI O APOLELUMENHN GAMHSAS MOIXATAI] K 28 700 892 1071 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 ByzLaParola:MOICATAI] Aleph C3 D L S Z 2* 69 209* 828 1241 1546MOICATAI KAI O APOLELUMENHN GAMHSAS MOICATAI] E F G H K 28 157 180 205 597 700 892 1006 1071 1242 1243 1292 1342 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 ByzThe "Vaticanus addition":KAI O APOLELUMENHN GAMHSAS MOICATAI] B (uniquely harmonised to 5:32)It's a bit of a puzzlement why this reading is separated from the Byz reading in UBS. The UBS apparatus appears to make 4 readings out of two, the other one being:KAI O APOLELUMENHN GAMWN MOICATAI] C* f1 1216a.k.a.MOICATAI KAI O APOLELUMENHN GAMWN MOICATAI] N O W Y Z Delta Theta Pi 078 0233 f13 33 (565) (579) 1009 1010 1079 1195 1230 1253 1424 1505They are wrong about Z here also. 5:32 is not extant for comparison in Z.Daniel Buck
From: Wieland Willker wie@... Sent: Thu, November 5, 2009 12:35:22 PM
I checked the reading in Abbott's editio princeps:
< http://www.archive. org/details/ parpalimpsestor0 0abbogoog>
LEGW D]E UMIN OS AN APO
LUS]H THN GUNAIKA AUTOU
MH] EPI PORNEIA KAI GAMH
S]H ALLHN MOICATAI KAI
O] APOLELUMENHN GAMH
Thus Z agrees with the Majority reading here.
Z is thus correctly noted in NA and wrongly in UBS.
Thanks for bringing this error to our attention!
For the complex problems of the passages the excellent article by Michael Holmes is recommended:
"The Matthean Divorce Passages" JBL 109 (1990) 651-664.
In the online commentary I suggest to add the passage in brackets.