What constitutes the Westcott and Hort Greek Text?
I have what is a simple(naive?)question.
I am of the opinion that when the W-H Greek text has two readings, one being their "primary reading" and the other their "secondary reading" that BOTH are a part of their Greek Text. Would I be correct in this? Or is it, when they could not decide which reading with certainty was the "true reading" and they gave both a "primary" and also a "secondary" reading only the former was actaully a part of their Greek Text?
Thanks for any considerations any might offer me in this matter.