Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

Expand Messages
  • Mitch Larramore
    Dr. Ehrman: If the motive was not financial, what do you think it was? The only other reasons that come to mind are ego or theological. Mitch Larramore Sugar
    Message 1 of 14 , Mar 31, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Dr. Ehrman:

      If the motive was not financial, what do you think it was? The only other reasons that come to mind are ego or theological.

      Mitch Larramore
      Sugar Land, Texas

      --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@...> wrote:

      From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@...>
      Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
      To: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:13 AM

          No one made money in the Christian tradition that way.  The motive for financial gain worked in other contexts (mainly pagan), e.g. when founders of libraries (Pergamum, etc.) were willing to pay cash on the head for "original" works of Plato or Euripides, etc.
       
          Most NT scholars are woefully ignorant about literary forgery in antiquity.  The best (and only complete) study is Wolfgang Speyer, Die literarische Faelschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (1971) -- a book very much worth reading.  For what it's worth, I'm working on a scholarly monograph now on the subject -- there is no complete study of early Christian pseudepigrapha in English (just a number of books dealing principally with issues related to the NT canon).
       
      -- Bart ehrman
       
      Bart D. Ehrman
      James A. Gray Professor
      Department of Religious Studies
      University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
       


      From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
      Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:42 PM
      To: Text Criticism
      Subject: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha


      In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?

      Eddie Mishoe
      Pastor


    • Jovial
      Most of these works were being copied and read by monks that had taken a vow of poverty. This was long before the days of printing presses - all books were
      Message 2 of 14 , Mar 31, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        Most of these works were being copied and read by monks that had taken a vow of poverty.  This was long before the days of printing presses - all books were copied by hand and therefore VERY expensive.  So no...financial gain was not the motive.
         
        "Forgery" may not always be the case.  If someone find something written by "Paul" or "Peter" or "Thomas" and they are confused as to WHICH "Peter" / "Thomas" it is - assuming someone in authority when it is not, that's not a forgery, just confusion.  Also, if someone is putting a "Gospel" together from all of the oral traditions they heard passed on to them, some of which may have gotten radically altered, and it is later discovered hundreds of years later dis-associated from it's original context and assumed by the finder that the author of "Thomas" is THE Thomas, rather than simply some simply layman with an interest in recording what he heard with the same name, that's not a "forgery".  There's lots of innocent explanations for the works found in history.  Unfortunately, too many people only consider that a given work they found was either written an apostle or someone closely associated with that name or some dishonest person forged that name, that's just not keeping all the possibilities in mind.
         
        Joe Viel
         
         
        ----- Original Message -----
        Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:13 AM
        Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

            No one made money in the Christian tradition that way.  The motive for financial gain worked in other contexts (mainly pagan), e.g. when founders of libraries (Pergamum, etc.) were willing to pay cash on the head for "original" works of Plato or Euripides, etc.
         
            Most NT scholars are woefully ignorant about literary forgery in antiquity.  The best (and only complete) study is Wolfgang Speyer, Die literarische Faelschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (1971) -- a book very much worth reading.  For what it's worth, I'm working on a scholarly monograph now on the subject -- there is no complete study of early Christian pseudepigrapha in English (just a number of books dealing principally with issues related to the NT canon).
         
        -- Bart ehrman
         
        Bart D. Ehrman
        James A. Gray Professor
        Department of Religious Studies
        University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
         


        From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
        Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:42 PM
        To: Text Criticism
        Subject: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha


        In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?

        Eddie Mishoe
        Pastor

      • Bart Ehrman
        Not sure this is relevant to the list -- except insofar as textual forgery is closely related to textual interpolation (where you insert a writing into someone
        Message 3 of 14 , Apr 1, 2009
        • 0 Attachment
              Not sure this is relevant to the list -- except insofar as textual forgery is closely related to textual interpolation (where you insert a writing into someone else's text, making it appear to be written by him when not) and textual corruption (where you rewrite someone's words to convince someone else that your words are the author's) -- but far and away the most common reason, evidently, that Christians produced forgeries (and they produced a *lot* of them) was to "get a hearing" for their view.  If you had something important to say (a view of the Gospel stories, an ethical position, a doctrinal claim) and knew that if you signed your own name (Marcus Timotheus or whatever) no one would take you very seriously, you migh consider signing your name  as Simon Peter, or Paul the Apostle, or ... take your pick.  This happened a lot in the context of Christian polemics in the first four centuries, which is what my book will be about.
           
          -- Bart Ehrman
           
          Bart D. Ehrman
          James A. Gray Professor
          Department of Religious Studies
          University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
           


          From: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com [mailto:textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mitch Larramore
          Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:09 PM
          To: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

          Dr. Ehrman:

          If the motive was not financial, what do you think it was? The only other reasons that come to mind are ego or theological.

          Mitch Larramore
          Sugar Land, Texas

          --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu> wrote:

          From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu>
          Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
          To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
          Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:13 AM

              No one made money in the Christian tradition that way.  The motive for financial gain worked in other contexts (mainly pagan), e.g. when founders of libraries (Pergamum, etc.) were willing to pay cash on the head for "original" works of Plato or Euripides, etc.
           
              Most NT scholars are woefully ignorant about literary forgery in antiquity.  The best (and only complete) study is Wolfgang Speyer, Die literarische Faelschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (1971) -- a book very much worth reading.  For what it's worth, I'm working on a scholarly monograph now on the subject -- there is no complete study of early Christian pseudepigrapha in English (just a number of books dealing principally with issues related to the NT canon).
           
          -- Bart ehrman
           
          Bart D. Ehrman
          James A. Gray Professor
          Department of Religious Studies
          University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
           


          From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
          Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:42 PM
          To: Text Criticism
          Subject: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha


          In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?

          Eddie Mishoe
          Pastor


        • Jovial
          I m sure that at least SOME of the ancient writings may have flow from the motivation you described below. But deception was not ALWAYS the motive. Many in
          Message 4 of 14 , Apr 1, 2009
          • 0 Attachment
            I'm sure that at least SOME of the ancient writings may have flow from the motivation you described below.  But deception was not ALWAYS the motive. 
             
            Many in Judaism always signed by what the name of their rabbincal master was, rather than their own name.  They'd have considered it dishonest to have signed their own name.  Some Christians, particular those that came from a Jewish background, may have picked up on that view of things as well.  It's not a matter of "forgery", but a different way of looking at giving credit.  We would consider it wrong to sign our teacher's name to something, they considered it wrong not to.
             
            On top of that, even in cases where someone signs their real name, and that name gets confused with someone famous.  Times writings get separated and re-combined wrongly....there's a multitude of explanations that have to be considered.
             
            At one level, the important thing is to separate the valid from the erroneous.  The issue of WHY it is not valid will split into many reasons, not all of which are malicious.  Error comes from all kinds of sources.  Too many for that matter.
             
            Joe Viel
             
             
             
             
            ----- Original Message -----
            Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:06 PM
            Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

                Not sure this is relevant to the list -- except insofar as textual forgery is closely related to textual interpolation (where you insert a writing into someone else's text, making it appear to be written by him when not) and textual corruption (where you rewrite someone's words to convince someone else that your words are the author's) -- but far and away the most common reason, evidently, that Christians produced forgeries (and they produced a *lot* of them) was to "get a hearing" for their view.  If you had something important to say (a view of the Gospel stories, an ethical position, a doctrinal claim) and knew that if you signed your own name (Marcus Timotheus or whatever) no one would take you very seriously, you migh consider signing your name  as Simon Peter, or Paul the Apostle, or ... take your pick.  This happened a lot in the context of Christian polemics in the first four centuries, which is what my book will be about.
             
            -- Bart Ehrman
             
            Bart D. Ehrman
            James A. Gray Professor
            Department of Religious Studies
            University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
             


            From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Mitch Larramore
            Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:09 PM
            To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
            Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

            Dr. Ehrman:

            If the motive was not financial, what do you think it was? The only other reasons that come to mind are ego or theological.

            Mitch Larramore
            Sugar Land, Texas

            --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu> wrote:

            From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu>
            Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
            To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
            Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:13 AM

                No one made money in the Christian tradition that way.  The motive for financial gain worked in other contexts (mainly pagan), e.g. when founders of libraries (Pergamum, etc.) were willing to pay cash on the head for "original" works of Plato or Euripides, etc.
             
                Most NT scholars are woefully ignorant about literary forgery in antiquity.  The best (and only complete) study is Wolfgang Speyer, Die literarische Faelschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (1971) -- a book very much worth reading.  For what it's worth, I'm working on a scholarly monograph now on the subject -- there is no complete study of early Christian pseudepigrapha in English (just a number of books dealing principally with issues related to the NT canon).
             
            -- Bart ehrman
             
            Bart D. Ehrman
            James A. Gray Professor
            Department of Religious Studies
            University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
             


            From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
            Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:42 PM
            To: Text Criticism
            Subject: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha


            In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?

            Eddie Mishoe
            Pastor


          • Eddie Mishoe
            Bart: What are the main indicators that the ones doing the corruptions are Christians? Are they Orthodox or non-Orthodox? Will you book read motives into the
            Message 5 of 14 , Apr 2, 2009
            • 0 Attachment
              Bart:

              What are the main indicators that the ones doing the corruptions are Christians? Are they Orthodox or non-Orthodox? Will you book read motives into the minds of these corruptors?

              Finally, if one corruptor changed  a single ms he got his hands on, say a letter to the Galatains. How does he find the other copies of Galations having been distributed to other largy church locations in other parts fo the empire? Of those he does find, he would to convince the holder of that ms to hand it over to this stranger, for enough time for his make is corrections.

              Eddie Mishoe
              Pastor

              --- On Wed, 4/1/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@...> wrote:
              From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@...>
              Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
              To: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com
              Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 3:06 PM

                  Not sure this is relevant to the list -- except insofar as textual forgery is closely related to textual interpolation (where you insert a writing into someone else's text, making it appear to be written by him when not) and textual corruption (where you rewrite someone's words to convince someone else that your words are the author's) -- but far and away the most common reason, evidently, that Christians produced forgeries (and they produced a *lot* of them) was to "get a hearing" for their view.  If you had something important to say (a view of the Gospel stories, an ethical position, a doctrinal claim) and knew that if you signed your own name (Marcus Timotheus or whatever) no one would take you very seriously, you migh consider signing your name  as Simon Peter, or Paul the Apostle, or ... take your pick.  This happened a lot in the context of Christian polemics in the first four centuries, which is what my book will be about.
               
              -- Bart Ehrman
               
              Bart D. Ehrman
              James A. Gray Professor
              Department of Religious Studies
              University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
               


              From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Mitch Larramore
              Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:09 PM
              To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
              Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

              Dr. Ehrman:

              If the motive was not financial, what do you think it was? The only other reasons that come to mind are ego or theological.

              Mitch Larramore
              Sugar Land, Texas

              --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu> wrote:

              From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu>
              Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
              To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
              Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:13 AM

                  No one made money in the Christian tradition that way.  The motive for financial gain worked in other contexts (mainly pagan), e.g. when founders of libraries (Pergamum, etc.) were willing to pay cash on the head for "original" works of Plato or Euripides, etc.
               
                  Most NT scholars are woefully ignorant about literary forgery in antiquity.  The best (and only complete) study is Wolfgang Speyer, Die literarische Faelschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (1971) -- a book very much worth reading.  For what it's worth, I'm working on a scholarly monograph now on the subject -- there is no complete study of early Christian pseudepigrapha in English (just a number of books dealing principally with issues related to the NT canon).
               
              -- Bart ehrman
               
              Bart D. Ehrman
              James A. Gray Professor
              Department of Religious Studies
              University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
               


              From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
              Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:42 PM
              To: Text Criticism
              Subject: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha


              In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?

              Eddie Mishoe
              Pastor



            • Bart Ehrman
              Joe, Thanks for your reply. What s your evidence for your claims about Judaism, and what texts are you referring to? -- Bart ehrman Bart D. Ehrman James A.
              Message 6 of 14 , Apr 2, 2009
              • 0 Attachment
                Joe,
                 
                   Thanks for your reply.  What's your evidence for your claims about Judaism, and what texts are you referring to?

                EDIT (Wie): We are again getting off-topic. Keep follow-ups off-list, please.

                 
                -- Bart ehrman
                 
                Bart D. Ehrman
                James A. Gray Professor
                Department of Religious Studies
                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                 


                From: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com [mailto:textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jovial
                Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:38 PM
                To: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com
                Subject: Re: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

                I'm sure that at least SOME of the ancient writings may have flow from the motivation you described below.  But deception was not ALWAYS the motive. 
                 
                Many in Judaism always signed by what the name of their rabbincal master was, rather than their own name.  They'd have considered it dishonest to have signed their own name.  Some Christians, particular those that came from a Jewish background, may have picked up on that view of things as well.  It's not a matter of "forgery", but a different way of looking at giving credit.  We would consider it wrong to sign our teacher's name to something, they considered it wrong not to.
                 
                On top of that, even in cases where someone signs their real name, and that name gets confused with someone famous.  Times writings get separated and re-combined wrongly....there' s a multitude of explanations that have to be considered.
                 
                At one level, the important thing is to separate the valid from the erroneous.  The issue of WHY it is not valid will split into many reasons, not all of which are malicious.  Error comes from all kinds of sources.  Too many for that matter.
                 
                Joe Viel
                 
                 
                 
                 
                ----- Original Message -----
                Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:06 PM
                Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

                    Not sure this is relevant to the list -- except insofar as textual forgery is closely related to textual interpolation (where you insert a writing into someone else's text, making it appear to be written by him when not) and textual corruption (where you rewrite someone's words to convince someone else that your words are the author's) -- but far and away the most common reason, evidently, that Christians produced forgeries (and they produced a *lot* of them) was to "get a hearing" for their view.  If you had something important to say (a view of the Gospel stories, an ethical position, a doctrinal claim) and knew that if you signed your own name (Marcus Timotheus or whatever) no one would take you very seriously, you migh consider signing your name  as Simon Peter, or Paul the Apostle, or ... take your pick.  This happened a lot in the context of Christian polemics in the first four centuries, which is what my book will be about.
                 
                -- Bart Ehrman
                 
                Bart D. Ehrman
                James A. Gray Professor
                Department of Religious Studies
                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                 


                From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Mitch Larramore
                Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:09 PM
                To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
                Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

                Dr. Ehrman:

                If the motive was not financial, what do you think it was? The only other reasons that come to mind are ego or theological.

                Mitch Larramore
                Sugar Land, Texas

                --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu> wrote:

                From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu>
                Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
                To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
                Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:13 AM

                    No one made money in the Christian tradition that way.  The motive for financial gain worked in other contexts (mainly pagan), e.g. when founders of libraries (Pergamum, etc.) were willing to pay cash on the head for "original" works of Plato or Euripides, etc.
                 
                    Most NT scholars are woefully ignorant about literary forgery in antiquity.  The best (and only complete) study is Wolfgang Speyer, Die literarische Faelschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (1971) -- a book very much worth reading.  For what it's worth, I'm working on a scholarly monograph now on the subject -- there is no complete study of early Christian pseudepigrapha in English (just a number of books dealing principally with issues related to the NT canon).
                 
                -- Bart ehrman
                 
                Bart D. Ehrman
                James A. Gray Professor
                Department of Religious Studies
                University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                 


                From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
                Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:42 PM
                To: Text Criticism
                Subject: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha


                In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?

                Eddie Mishoe
                Pastor


              • Bart Ehrman
                Eddy, I try to cover these and related questions in my book Orthodox Corruption of Scripture; I d suggest that as one place to turn! All best, -- Bart Ehrman
                Message 7 of 14 , Apr 2, 2009
                • 0 Attachment
                  Eddy,
                   
                      I try to cover these and related questions in my book Orthodox Corruption of Scripture; I'd suggest that as one place to turn!  All best,
                   
                  -- Bart Ehrman
                   
                  Bart D. Ehrman
                  James A. Gray Professor
                  Department of Religious Studies
                  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                   


                  From: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com [mailto:textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
                  Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:40 AM
                  To: textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com
                  Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

                  Bart:

                  What are the main indicators that the ones doing the corruptions are Christians? Are they Orthodox or non-Orthodox? Will you book read motives into the minds of these corruptors?

                  Finally, if one corruptor changed  a single ms he got his hands on, say a letter to the Galatains. How does he find the other copies of Galations having been distributed to other largy church locations in other parts fo the empire? Of those he does find, he would to convince the holder of that ms to hand it over to this stranger, for enough time for his make is corrections.

                  Eddie Mishoe
                  Pastor

                  --- On Wed, 4/1/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu> wrote:
                  From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu>
                  Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
                  To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
                  Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2009, 3:06 PM

                      Not sure this is relevant to the list -- except insofar as textual forgery is closely related to textual interpolation (where you insert a writing into someone else's text, making it appear to be written by him when not) and textual corruption (where you rewrite someone's words to convince someone else that your words are the author's) -- but far and away the most common reason, evidently, that Christians produced forgeries (and they produced a *lot* of them) was to "get a hearing" for their view.  If you had something important to say (a view of the Gospel stories, an ethical position, a doctrinal claim) and knew that if you signed your own name (Marcus Timotheus or whatever) no one would take you very seriously, you migh consider signing your name  as Simon Peter, or Paul the Apostle, or ... take your pick.  This happened a lot in the context of Christian polemics in the first four centuries, which is what my book will be about.
                   
                  -- Bart Ehrman
                   
                  Bart D. Ehrman
                  James A. Gray Professor
                  Department of Religious Studies
                  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                   


                  From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Mitch Larramore
                  Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:09 PM
                  To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
                  Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha

                  Dr. Ehrman:

                  If the motive was not financial, what do you think it was? The only other reasons that come to mind are ego or theological.

                  Mitch Larramore
                  Sugar Land, Texas

                  --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu> wrote:

                  From: Bart Ehrman <behrman@email. unc.edu>
                  Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha
                  To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
                  Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 7:13 AM

                      No one made money in the Christian tradition that way.  The motive for financial gain worked in other contexts (mainly pagan), e.g. when founders of libraries (Pergamum, etc.) were willing to pay cash on the head for "original" works of Plato or Euripides, etc.
                   
                      Most NT scholars are woefully ignorant about literary forgery in antiquity.  The best (and only complete) study is Wolfgang Speyer, Die literarische Faelschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum (1971) -- a book very much worth reading.  For what it's worth, I'm working on a scholarly monograph now on the subject -- there is no complete study of early Christian pseudepigrapha in English (just a number of books dealing principally with issues related to the NT canon).
                   
                  -- Bart ehrman
                   
                  Bart D. Ehrman
                  James A. Gray Professor
                  Department of Religious Studies
                  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                   


                  From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:textualcrit icism@yahoogroup s.com] On Behalf Of Eddie Mishoe
                  Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:42 PM
                  To: Text Criticism
                  Subject: [textualcriticism] Pseudonymity or Pseudepigrapha


                  In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?

                  Eddie Mishoe
                  Pastor



                • torahman6
                  Eddie, From an Old Testament perspective, you might consider the writings of Qohelet. The book is not pseudonymous per se (he never refers to himself as
                  Message 8 of 14 , Apr 14, 2009
                  • 0 Attachment
                    Eddie,

                    From an Old Testament perspective, you might consider the writings of Qohelet. The book is not pseudonymous per se (he never refers to himself as Solomon), but the writer is certainly trying give that impression (e.g. melek yisrael, benay dawid).

                    Considering the socio-historical context observed from the book alone (its difficult to place it historically, but much can be learned simply from the text), a voice like Qohelet's would likely never gain any credibility. Put as a "royal fiction," (not just my opinion, but also the opinion of several critical scholars) however, the result of its canonization into biblical material speaks for itself.

                    In short, then, what I am saying is that I think one reason for writing a pseudopigraphical work is for credibility and validation of the message.

                    Rob Kashow
                    ThM candidate
                    Dallas Theological Seminary



                    --- In textualcriticism@yahoogroups.com, Eddie Mishoe <edmishoe@...> wrote:
                    >
                    >
                    > In several articles I have read recently about this subject matter, many writers contend that the main motivation for writing pseudonymous writings was for financial gain. How does one attain financial gain by saying he/she has discovered another letter having been written by Paul or Peter?
                    >
                    > Eddie Mishoe
                    > Pastor
                    >
                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.