Re: [textualcriticism] Re: Boernerianus
- I'm actually curious about the Matthew commentary at the back of the manuscript. Does anyone know if any work on it has been done?
> > I'm intrigued by the introductory pages of Boernerianus, but haven't
> > been able to find a description of what they contain. The script and
> > style is so different from the text of the Paulines that it doesn't
> > appear to have been in the same hand.
> It's not. It's a later commentary (On 2nd Timothy). The back pages
> are also filled with a commentary (Matthew). According to Dr
> Reichardt, there appears to be an attempt to modify the end of the
> codex, possible to remove the letter to the Laodicians. (though my
> translation from german could be flawed).
> The "Vorbericht" to facsimile of the Boernerianus
> (http://www.csntm.org/Manuscripts/GA%20012/ images 012_005.jpg to
> 012_024.jpg) has a lot of information in german. My attempt at an
> English translation is available here: (
> https://aries.relyeahome.org/mss/boernerianus ). The .odt is an
> open office format (open office is available for free down load
> from the open office website
> http://download.openoffice.org/2.3.1/index.html) is the original
> (since Microsoft products do not run on my OS). The .doc is a
> Microsoft Word doc written from open office. The .pdf is an adobe
> Acrobat file, also written from open office).
> << smime.p7s >>
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze