Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [textualcriticism] Re: Romans 3:

Expand Messages
  • brian boland
    Swanson has extensive listings on verse 9. Also on verse 10 gives wide approval for dropping hOTI and for OUK ESTIN DIKAIOS OUDE OUK ESTIN DIKAIOS
    Message 1 of 6 , Oct 13, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Swanson has extensive listings on verse 9. Also on verse 10 gives wide approval for dropping "hOTI "
       and  for OUK ESTIN DIKAIOS OUDE

      OUK ESTIN DIKAIOS            1241
      OUK ESTIN DIKAIOS OU       D*
      OUK ESTIN DIKAIOS OUDAI  many
      OUK OUK ESTI DIKAIOS OUDE
      OUK         ESTI  DIKAIOS OUDE

      Whilst Robinson/Pierpont went for

      KAQWS GEGRAPTAI [hOTI ] OUK ESTIN DIKAIOS OUDE hEIS

      Where does the Pershitta stand on these differences ?
      Brian j


      J
      __


      Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Try it now.

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.