[textualcriticism] Erasmus' 1st and 2nd did NOT have the Comma
- My previous post about Scrivener's collation of Erasmus editions contained a major error. I said Erasmus Editions 1,2 contained the Johannine Comma of 1 John 5:7,8 like Stephens's edition, but it did not. Erasmus' 1st and 2nd editions did not contain the Comma. His 3rd edition was his first to contain it.I did not see a small minus sign in Scrivener's book. The older I get, the more I need to have others proof-read my work.David Robert Palmer----- Original Message -----From: David Robert PalmerSent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 2:51 AMSubject: [textualcriticism] Re: Rebuttal of Jones on Johannine CommaI see 4 general groupings of the Comma:GROUP ONE:[[EN TW OURANW, O PATHR, O LOGOS, KAI TO AGION PNEUMA; KAI OUTOI OI TREIS hEN EISI. KAI TREIS EISIN OI MARTUROUNTES EN TH GH ]], TO PNEUMA KAI TO UDWR KAI TO AIMA, KAI OI TREIS EIS TO hEN EISIN. - 221mg 2318 2473 Erasmus 1, 2; Stephens (acc. to Scriv., 88mg matches this group except for Moveable NUs, and 221mg and Stephens may differ in that regard as well; Stephens 1550 removes the last NU.)
My PDF on the comma is now corrected. The link to that is http://www.bibletra nslation. ws/trans/ FirstJohnCh5v7. pdf.