Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Mark and Proto-Mark

Expand Messages
  • Wieland Willker
    Jim, you are quite an original thinker! Interesting idea! Some initial comments: 1. The final reviser was probably not responsible for ALL Mk-only material. 2.
    Message 1 of 2 , Dec 20, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Jim,

      you are quite an original thinker! Interesting idea!

      Some initial comments:
      1. The final reviser was probably not responsible for ALL Mk-only
      material.
      2. The final reviser also probably introduced changes elsewhere. Perhaps
      one should add additionally Mark's words where Mt and Lk have a Minor
      Agreement?

      > (7) 16:10 - poreuqeisa
      Mk elsewhere uses compounds only.

      > (39) 1:28, 16:20 - pantacou
      Note that the Byz text omits PANTACOU in 1:28

      > 16:11 - hpisthsan
      > "apistian" - 6:6 "apistov" - 9:19 "apistia" - 9:24
      The Aland Synopsis has parallels at 9:19:
      Mt 17:17 and Lk 9:41

      You did this the old fashioned way with a printed Synopsis only? Do you
      have a list of all Mk-only material (chapters and verse numbers)?

      Best wishes
      Wieland
      <><
      ------------------------------------------------
      Wieland Willker, Bremen, Germany
      mailto:willker@...-bremen.de
      http://www.uni-bremen.de/~wie
      Textcritical commentary:
      http://www.uni-bremen.de/~wie/TCG/index.html
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.