Re: [textualcriticism] Re: Heb. 4:2 Textual Criticism
- Regardless of your inclination to understand AKOUW in this passage as "to carry the stronger sense of 'really listen', 'heed'", I think it is obvious that the author intends that the reader understand that they, in fact, did NOT really listen and heed since it OUK WFELHSEN "was of no benefit." As regards the acc pl SUGKEKERASMENOUS, I don't see that it is "so difficult that it makes an intelligent and attentive reader stop cold and say, 'What??'" It is in agreement with EKEINOUS who are thus said to have not been united with faith. Perhaps the problem is that you are attempting to relate it to hO LOGOS ?george
gfsomselTherefore, O faithful Christian, search for truth, hear truth,
learn truth, love truth, speak the truth, hold the truth,
defend the truth till death.- Jan Hus
_________----- Original Message ----
From: Webb <webb@...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 1:16:24 PM
Subject: RE: [textualcriticism] Re: Heb. 4:2 Textual Criticism
Of course, the puzzle is where the "difficulty" of a reading crosses over from recommending it to arguing against it. I love it when a reading is difficult in the sense that a sleepy copyist will trip over it or mis-hear it as something more familiar, but then it makes perfect sense on a second look. In the present case, the best-attested reading is so difficult that it makes an intelligent and attentive reader stop cold and say, "What??"
The accusative reading just simply can't be original, in my opinion, because time and time again in the portion of Hebrews that precedes this verse, the author talks about people hearing (AKOUW) but not being saved, or not believing. In order for 4:2 to make any sense, TOIS AKOUSASIN would require AKOUW suddenly "and uniquely in Hebrews" to carry the stronger sense of "really listen", "heed" (BAGD mng 4). The author is far too sophisticated to make that kind of blunder.
So I'm forced to agree with those who think SUGKEKERASMENOUS can't be correct, even if it goes back to a copy that is parent to everything we have. Mistakes, after all, get made in every single ms, including the oldest ones.
____________ _________ _________ _________ _
From: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
[mailto:textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of yennifmit
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 7:20 AM
To: textualcriticism@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [textualcriticism] Re: Heb. 4:2 Textual Criticism
I collect various commentators' opinions on this at "BASIS FOR
CRITERIA DATA", "Heb 4.2", in part 2 of my dissertation
(http://purl. org/tfinney/ PhD/PDF/part2. pdf). (Warning: file size is
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.