On a second thought, it may only be P75 after all (= P.Bodmer XIV and
Centre for Theology and Religious Studies
2006-10-30 kl. 13.05 skrev Tommy Wasserman:
> Absolutely P75, and probably also P66 since they say "two codices ..."
> Strangely they did not bother about P72.
> Tommy Wasserman
> Wieland Willker wrote:
>> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Jim West <jwest@...> wrote:
>> > Listers may find this to be of interest:
>> Are they talking about P75???