Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: SBL Paper on the Origin(s) of the 'Caesarean' Text

Expand Messages
  • Wieland Willker
    Let me quote the concluding paragraph of Carlson s text: It is striking to see how closely this proposed stemma generated by a completely new technology
    Message 1 of 3 , Nov 18, 2004
      Let me quote the concluding paragraph of Carlson's text:

      "It is striking to see how closely this proposed stemma generated by a
      completely new technology supports the venerable conclusions of New
      Testament textual critics, going all the way back to Westcott and Hort.
      Perhaps the main reason why there seems to have been so little progress
      in advancing the history of the text since Westcott and Hort is that
      Westcott and Hort's theory of the text is so substantially correct that
      there is actually little left to advance."

      It is funny, I just finished an evaluation of all differences of the
      text of WH and NA in the Gospels (451) for my TCG commentary (new
      edition in January) and concluded:

      "One will probably not agree with my estimation of the evidence in all
      cases, but I think it is clear that the WH text still has its value
      today. It is slightly inferior to NA, but one cannot say that it is
      wrong in all cases. About 60% of all differences are so difficult to
      evaluate, that there is a strong possibility that NA is, to some extent
      at least, wrong.
      In light of the manifold criticisms of WH's opinions regarding the
      transmission of the text, it is astonishing that their text is so good
      still today. This is on the one hand probably primarily due to the fact
      that their basic result, to follow B wherever possible, is not so bad as
      it is normally accepted today, and on the other hand, that their
      opinions regarding the textual history are, with some qualifications,
      probably also basically correct."

      Well, this is probably a bit of an oversimplification of a very complex
      matter and perhaps I will change the last paragraph a bit for the final
      version, but basically I stand by it. (NB: It only refers to the
      Gospels, they are my only object of research.)

      Best wishes
      Textcritical commentary:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.