Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Error list Greeven TC Mark, 2005

Expand Messages
  • Wieland Willker
    Textkritik des Markusevangeliums Greeven, Heinrich / Gueting, Eberhard publisher: LIT Verlag http://www.lit-verlag.de/isbn/3-8258-6878-8 ISBN : 3-8258-6878-8
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 9 1:14 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      Textkritik des Markusevangeliums
      Greeven, Heinrich / Gueting, Eberhard
      publisher: LIT Verlag
      http://www.lit-verlag.de/isbn/3-8258-6878-8
      ISBN : 3-8258-6878-8
      768 pages, 99,90 Eur

      Here are some errors/problems that I noticed while reading the book.


      p. 78 "Dieser Anstoß wäre in (III) beseitigt" must be
      "Dieser Anstoß wäre in (II) beseitigt"

      p. 120 2nd paragraph: "B lässt das Wort aus" must be
      "b lässt das Wort aus"
      (it's the Old Latin b!)

      p. 143 "Verdacht der Angleichung an Matthäus (nfl) und Lukas (Ausnahme: W)"
      must be:
      "Verdacht der Angleichung an Matthäus (Ausnahme: W) und Lukas (nfl) "
      same next paragraph:
      "ist mit einer einzigen Ausnahme bei Lukas (W)"
      must be:
      "ist mit einer einzigen Ausnahme bei Mattäus (W)"

      p. 216 "hH ADELFH *anstelle* von hOI ADELFOI Lk 18:19"
      This is wrong. D, X, Delta, Psi ADD the words! See IGNTP Luke.

      p. 246 G et al. omit only KAI PROSTEQHSETAI UMIN, but have TOIS AKOUOUSIN
      The complete omission is supported by D, W, 565, 579, pc !
      See T&T #60

      p. 268 "... so kommen zu den Dat.-Stellen 9 weitere hinzu (... Jh 9:28...)"
      should be "Jh 9:38"

      p. 270 "In 9:38 dagegen haben wir Grund, AUTON für sekundär zu halten"
      should be "AUTW".

      p. 320 Mk 6:23 The support for the omission is not "L*" but simply "L". K. Witte from Muenster checked this at the film and found no correction.

      p. 321 1st paragraph: "muss das sehr alt, " must be " muss das sehr alte"

      p. 349 last paragraph of 6:51: The Omega before the Theta must be a Latin W. See witnesses on p. 348.

      p. 464 2nd last paragraph: Act 10:3; 13:3 must be: Act 10:30; 13:3.

      p. 481 paragraph "Nun steht ...": Mt 15:29 must be 5:29.

      p. 570 last paragraph of 12:13: "12,9.13.37" must be "12,9.14.37".

      p. 593 12:27(2) first paragraph: I don't understand Greeven's discussion here. Mt reads the same as Mk here, how can Mt be unequivocal, but Mk equivocal? Perhaps I am missing something here.

      p. 608 Second last line of 12:36: "Lk 20:42" must be "Lk 20:43"

      p. 625 second last paragraph "Tregelles ... strichen es." Wrong. Tregelles has the words.


      Best wishes
      Wieland
      <><
      ------------------------------------------------
      Wieland Willker, Bremen, Germany
      mailto:willker@...-bremen.de
      http://www.uni-bremen.de/~wie
      Textcritical commentary:
      http://www.uni-bremen.de/~wie/TCG/index.html
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.