Re: [textualcriticism] Leviticus 23 fragments
- Roger Pearse wrote:
>--- In email@example.com, "Daniel Buck"Several
>>It's tempting to jump to conclusions from just 20 letters on 3 lines
>>of text, but the orthography does look 1st century to me.
>Is there an image anywhere online yet?
Tyler Williams has done a fine job of analysing the photos.
>You guys should read the biblioblogs. The texts have been discussed,
>>Don't you just hate it when they publish this as real
>>interesting news and don't even bother to stipulate which
>>verses it supposedly is from Leviticus?
>Deeply frustrating -- but it shows how marginal manuscripts really are
>in the modern world. If we want things to be different, we have to
>think of a way to make it so.
analyzed, reproduced, and evaluated there since early yesterday.
D. Jim West
Biblical Studies Resources - http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
Biblical Theology Weblog - http://biblical-studies.blogspot.com