2954Re: [textualcriticism] New Ending to the Gospel of Mark?
- Feb 23, 2007Concerning another ending...
It is amazing just how many attempts have been made to
reach beyond Mark 16:8. Surely, the Gospel of Mark
ends at 16:8. But to the credit of those who have
argued for an extension beyond 16:8 (and these
extensions have been less than satisfactory), it does
seem plausible that Mark 1:1-16:8 expects indeed hopes
for closure. In order for the textual critic to
perceive this, he must first understand what Mark is
saying. So, I would argue on a very precise level
that Mark expects his reader not only "to understand"
but to continue the work he began (hence, Matthew and
Luke). Therefore, those in the past who have written
"an ENDING" have done so with little success. That an
ending must come, however, is imminent. But who is
worthy to write an end to Mark? Who is worthy to break
the seal at 16:8?
--- Wieland Willker <willker@...-bremen.de>
> This may turn out to be interesting:____________________________________________________________________________________
> Stephen Carlson alerts us on his blog to this:
> -----start blog quote----------------------------
> On the Crosstalk list, James Ernest, ânew Markan
> ending?â? (Feb. 18, 2007), points out an intriguing
> article from BYU, Mysteries of Ancient Egyptian
> Papyri Revealed (Feb. 14, 2007). Hereâs the beef:
> "Three BYU professors have uncovered mysteries in
> ancient Egyptian writings aided by new technology
> that allows people to see inscriptions invisible to
> the naked eye.
> The professors Roger Macfarlane, Stephen Bay and
> Thomas Wayment, have been working on deciphering
> these writings on papyrus found in an Egyptian dump
> where an ancient city known as Oxyrhynchus
> previously existed. The papyri are now housed at the
> University of Oxford in England and studied by
> various scholars around the globe.
> The technology developed by BYU called multispectral
> imaging, can penetrate through dirt, stains and
> other material on the papyri, making it possible to
> expose obscured lettering.
> Specific material in these texts include an
> unidentified Christian apocryphal Gospel, a new
> ending to the Gospel of Mark, a different version of
> two verses in the book of Philemon, and a missing
> section in Luke 22:43-44. In the King James Version,
> these verses in Luke talk about Christ shedding
> blood in the Garden of Gethsemane."
> A ânew ending to the Gospel of Markâ?? What can
> they possibly be talking about?
> MORE: In any case, a new Oxyrhynchus papyrus scrap
> of Mark (even without a ânew endingâ?) would be
> noteworthy. As best as I can tell from POxy:
> Oxyrhynchus Online, no copy of the Gospel according
> to Mark has yet been found among them.
> UPDATE: April DeConick asks if multispectral
> analysis can âhelp us with Saying 30 in the Gospel
> of Thomas?â? (Feb. 19, 2007).
> NOTE: An email inquiry of mine (Feb. 20, 2007) has
> not yet been answered, but, as of Feb. 21, 2007, the
> news article has now disappeared from the BYU site.
> -----end blog
> Just to repeat this:
> - an unidentified Christian apocryphal Gospel
> - a new ending to the Gospel of Mark
> - a different version of two verses in the book of
> - and a missing section in Luke 22:43-44
> Best wishes
> Wieland Willker, Bremen, Germany
> Textcritical commentary:
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>