Flux Capacitor/ the Spatial Harnessing of Resonance.
- Following is a post to electrogravity list concerning this matter.
--- Quark137@... wrote:
> Associates in Electrogravitation -The concept here presented of a "standing wave" on a
> Dear Associates and All:
> I am pleased to announce the posting of Steve Burns
> new paper, "Device.pdf"
> available now online at:
> This paper deals with the generation and control of
> the electrogravitational
> field capable of propulsion and gravitational field
> Jerry E. Bayles
lossless transmission line in many ways presents the
same idea as a single phased flux capacitor. In the
transmission line standing wave analogy, it is the
"space" arounde the two wire transmission line that
contains the electric and magnetic field components.
However some confusion may be in order here by the
traditional historic confusion regarding resonance and
The standing wave analogy is made analogous to
antiresonance, or the parallel resonance found in a
tank circuit. In that condition the phase angles are
almost ,but never truly 180 out of phase. It is the
lossless case of zero resistance that would make the
phases truly 180 degrees phase shifted.
Because the space around the wires itself will contain
both the electric field and magnetic field E and B
vectors,in orthogonal relationship, the power
dissipation in space is given as the cross vector
product of E and B. It will be noted that the author
Steve Burns shows this Ponting vector at various time
periods in the standing wave, as acting in opposite
directions. This is exactly the predicted action of a
single phased flux capacitor.
Let us define what this means. To do this we will
expand the double wire transmission line example to
actual large discrete components. I use 20,000 wind,
23 gauge, 60 henry air core coils for this research.
We then have a large quantity L. It is necessary for
this quantity to be large in order to make this flux
capacitor, because ordinarily we might first try to
construct one using the 60 hz wall frequency. Now to
resonate the large coil at 60 hz requires a C value in
series with L at about .12 uf. Because of the acting q
of 15 in these coils, a resonant voltage rise of 15
times the 120 volts household AC input will occur, in
opposite polarities, in both the series joined LC
There is nothing new or profound in those facts at
To resonate the coils a large series of oil caps are
made to accomidate the voltage rises, where these 60
henry coils can also be 440 volt inputed, due to the
1000 ohms resistance they contain. We have a situation
where a Magnetic field B, containing LI^2/2 joules,
expresses itself,(closely) concurrent to the voltage
input, where the primary location in space of this
highest flux density of the magnetic field is in its
interior core volume. Now the energy is all expressed
kinetically, and when it goes into its potential form
as the electric field quantity CV^2/2, that energy
storage will have moved to a different space, the
space of the oil based capacitors.
The remarkable adaptation I have called a "Flux
Capacitor" is to make the important possibility of
allowing an orthogonal reaction force between the
energy manifestations inherent in E and B vector
reaction products. To do this merely only shows the
hard route ahead in attempting to actually construct a
flux capacitor example. To make the example it is only
necessary to make the provision that both the energy
transfer manifestions from L to C occuring twice per
input frequency resonance,WERE MADE TO OCCUR IN THE
SAME SPATIAL VOLUMES IN ORTHOGONAL RELATIONSHIP,
SECURING THE REQUIREMENT FOR A E X B REACTION FORCE.
The obvious problems with this proposal is recognized
by the requirement of a axial cylindrical capacity
that can be inserted into the core volume of the coil.
This reveals the limitations of that approach, because
no mechanical reaction forces would be noted, because
in each half cycle of resonance, the E X B reaction
force would be in opposing directions, exactly as
shown in the tramsmisson wire example.
Thus to secure the requirement that E X B be
unidirectional, we must make even a further
modification. We do not need a rotor that acts like a
washing machine, producing opposing torques on each
half cycle of input frequency. Thus the idea of making
a flux capacitor is abandoned, to make two juxtaposed
flux capacitors, producing two unidirectional reaction
forces on two cylindrical capacities, in two Separate
E X B reactions.
In the first modification, the fields in resonance
were given the requirement that they both exist in the
same space. In the second modification, two power
inputs, or phases are used to make the additional
requirement that both electric and magnetic fields
also exist in the same time period. A single phase of
resonance has an oscillation of energy where it is
either kinetic or potential, expressed as magnetic
field or electric, and these relative expressions in
time being 90 degrees out of phase.
So now to satisfy the requirement that one input phase
of resonance will contain a full electric field, at
the same time that its adjacent phase will contain a
full magnetic field, simply means that the correct
input phasing for that relationship will be 90 degrees
also. To procure a theorized unidirectional reaction
force, two flux capcitors are not made, but instead
the cylindrical capacity rotor from one resonant phase
is inserted into the magnetic field from the adjacent
phase, and vice versa, so that we could say we have a
set of juxtaposed flux capacitors, where all 4 L and C
quantites are interphased for reaction.
Remarkable possibilities also exist in this approach.
First of all, because of the size of the coils, the
energy transfer through fields in resonance can exceed
the energy transfer as I squared R ohmic losses on the
coils. It is the flux capacitor idea that itself that
taps into that energy tranfer, without in turn
deleting the potential available in the E field, which
always occurs in direct schematic insertion of a load
into the resonance quantity. At 60 hz,120 volts AC
these coils will have 15 watts energy transfer as heat
loss, but 45 watts in resonant energy tranfer. That
output is also found in the single phased theorized E
X B reaction, simply because the energy is limited by
timing which only .707 of an expanding magnetic field
can react with .707 of a collapsing magnetic field.
Thus it is easy to see in the postulated single phase
case, the output does not exceed the input as measured
as that resonant energy transfer.
However when we change this scenario so that a full
magnetic field DOES react with a full electric field,
on a non cancelling reaction force over time, we begun
to indeed wonder why that output,(actually two
outputs) would not exceed those two power inputs.
How this might eventually apply to antigravity would
be the additional adaptation made where the coils
themselves are bound to the rotors to produce a self
I have seen this possible in a DC demonstration, and
all of the above is the same analogy applied to AC.
In The DC demonstration, a current passed from the
center of a neodymium disc to a mercury bath caused
the magnet to rotate on its center axis, parallel to
B. Here a Static E as superimposed voltage
perpendicular to the bound B of the magnet itself,
cases a reaction force that is not in cancellation
with the input, simply because that reaction force is
orthogonal, and not directly opposed to that input,
where this can broadly be defined as analogous to a
gyroscopic self reaction force.
Tests with this idea are currently being made used a
Strontium ferrite capacity. The typical problem with a
postulated flux cap construction consists of the fact
that high dielectric constant materials must be used,
otherwise the capacity needed for resonance would
never fit inside the volume of the air core inductor,
at right angle field orientation. To decrease the
needed amount of capacity, the input frequerncy can be
increased, where for these tests 476 hz by alternator
AC conversion is used for a 3 phase input. The needed
Sr Fe capacity of one phase, will be inserted into an
adjacent phases magnetic field. Note that because the
inputs would be 120 phased resonances, instead of 90,
a partial cancellation force will still exists as a E
x B reaction force. But if a 90 degree deflection
force is shown to exist, this paves the way for an
actual 90 degree phased version of the principle.