## Overunity by REASONED definition.

Expand Messages
• It means we get more amperage by Ohms Law, than we should get by the impressed measured voltage. Although this can be attained by several means, the ways and
Message 1 of 1 , Mar 2, 2002
It means we get more amperage by Ohms Law, than we should get by the
impressed measured voltage. Although this can be attained by several
means, the ways and means of achieving it bring the whole definition
into question. Is it truly overunity?

In the case of 3 phase alternator inputs showing these effects,
there are reasonable arguments that can be made to show that the
results are only occuring from special considerations. Therefore that
argument can be removed by scaling up the resistance of tested
models. The problem to be determined is specifically this; by the
laws of maximum power transfer it is known that when the load equals
the internal resistance of the source, maximum power transfer occurs,
but it then occurs at 50% efficiency.

This would not be so problematic as a definition, if it were for not
a single perplexing fact, which is that the internal resistance of
the source ACTUALLY appears to change with the common ways it is
accounted for.
By taking the standard definitions of generator action, and
comparing those definitions as compared to what is delivered by AC 3
phase converted alternator, significant deviations are noted. The AC
converted alternator DOES NOT WORK as would be deciphered from book
knowledge. That knowledge will dictate that if a short is placed on
the output, maximum amperage will occur. Book knowlege tells this
with graphs explaining that yes that max amperage does appear, but
when it occurs the voltage of the source will have also dropped to
such a degree that there is ACTUALLY LESS POWER TRANSFER, than would
occur by registered voltage times impressed amperage if the
conditions for maximum power transfer occured.

By shorting out a stator phase and measuring the amperage in this
experimentation at 480 hz, it is determined that on delta short the R
(int) value should be 1/5 ohm. What this further means in actual load
application is that then if the load were actually the same value,
the open circuit voltage should only drop 50 % on that same 1/5 ohm
load. However with the experimentation using those approximate ohmic
resistances in WYE for magnetic cancellation in 3 spirals in mutual
induction, the actual voltage drop from open circuit is far beyond
50%. Thus the impressed voltage is being reduced far beyond what
should be occuring, and with the effect of theorized mutual
inductance we wind up with more amperage on the circuit than can be
explained by the reduced apparent voltage, and its conduction by Ohms
law. To further explain the excess of current we can speculate that
not one, by two emf sources are on on the windings, and the voltage
meter only shows the apparent emf input by the alternator, but
actually each winding recieves additional and beyond source emf by
mutual induction of spiral windings.

To go further here, the actual acting resistance that exhibits that
50% drop in open circuit voltage vs loaded state appears to be about
1 ohm, and not 1/5 ohm. This additionally means that tests showing
excess amperage using 1/5 ohm loads in magnetic cancellation via WYE
spiral mutual inductance are actually tests made with the generator
in OVERLOAD operation, although this was not initially ascertained by
tests of short measured amperages.

Thus in this reasoning, the same tests need to be made again with the
resistances of the wye spirals in magnetic cancellation brought close
to 1 ohm, whereby then if the same effect of excess amperage is
noted, the error brought on by measurements made by generator in