Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

High Induction Coils Rewound

Expand Messages
  • Harvey D Norris
    Manufacturers of magnet wire do not supply an inner lead on the winding for passing current through the entire spool. Formerly this had to be done with an 80
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 15, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Manufacturers of magnet wire do not supply an inner lead on the
      winding for passing current through the entire spool. Formerly this
      had to be done with an 80 lb coil rewound onto another spool; where
      the specs for 23 gauge wire show this would be nine miles of wire. The
      first experimentation with 60 hz source frequency resonance took place
      with these huge 60 Henry Coils of ~ 1000 ohms. It gave an acting Q of
      15, from a predicted 20. Two of the coils could be inversely series
      resonated for simultaneously opposite voltage rises; whereby a
      combined Q of 30 is obtained. During the tuning the coils can be
      placed base to base so that magnetic unity increases each coils
      impedance, thereby gaining a higher Q factor by the interaction of
      mutual inductance. A paradox however exists regarding the fact that
      when the pair of coils are INVERSELY series resonated; which is simply
      one set of series LC values attached oppositely in series to the
      input: this implies that even though the tuning was accomplished with
      the higher reactances present in magnetic unity between the coils, the
      magnetic unity of these fields should not be present after being
      inversely placed in series resonances, since the effect of inversely
      phased resonances is to produce opposite magnetic field orientations
      between the coils. This is reffered to as the Binary Resonant
      Paradox. When this was explained to Doc, he puzzled and asked "Well
      what kind of polarity would then exist if the coil was in between two
      equal capacities in series?" Damn good question. In any case all the
      former 23 gauge coils (~ 480 lb.s) had been stolen by the criminal
      DiGrino family, so upon consideration of replacement costs I find they
      want about 12 dollars a lb, so each of the 6 coils will cost ~ a
      thousand dollars to replace. To replace these stolen assets I have
      now purchased 23 lb of 23 gauge wire on two different 6 inch OD
      spools, and have seen that it seems practical to "miniaturize" the
      binary resonant system without a significant loss in voltage rise.
      One eighth the volume of copper can be used on smaller spools to
      theoretically produce about 1/3 the voltage of the former 160 lb system.

      Doc & I rewound the spools using a modified drill press set up; about
      30 -40 minutes unwinding over a mile of wire. They register near 140
      ohms. An AC variac test at 100 volts yielded a current of .1 A,
      having an impedance of 1000 ohms, vs the former 20,000 ohms when a
      larger 80 lb coil was wound. The theoretical Q factor for 60 hz is
      then X(L)/R = 1000/140 = 7.14, where formerly this was 20. These
      smaller coils also offer use in alternator frequency resonances. A
      single phase motor to drive the alternator was also stolen; this is
      being replaced also.

      Sincerely Harvey D Norris
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.