Re: FEB 2006 TESLAFY Investigations
- --- In email@example.com, "Harvey D Norris" <harvich@...> wrote:
> Good to get into the habit of monthly teslafy investigations as
> say; so this month a question is posed?would be the difference if instead
> Shall A capacitive reactance load be amplified with regard to its
> ferromagnetic transformation?
> If I need 500 uf to resonate,(to the alternator output itself) what
> I used 62 times less capacitance via the intervening 62/1 voltage~8
> rise available with a pole pig tranformer so that I now need only
> uf to represent the same capacitive draw on the source thatcapacities
> ordinarily would involve the huge quantity of 500 uf??? The
> difference between the reflection of impedance draw through the
> transformer, and the draw through actual nameplate higher
> might be compared as such, as to how high each case supplies anThese things will have to wait for now, all the garage equipment for
> increase of stator voltage, and the possible losses through the
> transformer case also accounted for.
> Tests will tell...
> Sincerely HDN
teslafy research will shortly be moved to a new garage area..., this
presents some problem with regards to three heavy transformers at the
garage entrance, each of these being near 500 lbs. I will try
running these capacitive draw tests before the pole pig is moved, but
in the meantime the kerosene heater has been transfered to the new
house, making garage tinkering in the winter somewhat of a hassle
with the continuance of cold weather in Ohio. The new house I will be
residing in also now requires a lot of work with the ripping up of
carpet, and laying of tile, ect, so it may be awhile before
experimental issues are addressed.