Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3 Phase mutual inductance of .15 Henry/ 14 gauge columns@ 480 hz

Expand Messages
  • Harvey D Norris
    Teardown and rearragement of 30 coil system is soon to be made again, perhaps back to original arrangements for better twice increased q factor. As such
    Message 1 of 1 , Jan 29, 2006
      Teardown and rearragement of 30 coil system is soon to be made again,
      perhaps back to original arrangements for better twice increased q
      factor. As such recording from notes and reinvestigations here are
      made for future references...

      3 Phase mutual inductance of .15 Henry/ 14 gauge columns@ 480 hz

      It has been formerly noted that when only two phases are employed,
      with two sets of 10 coil/500 ft spools in series; the reactive
      measurements indicate that when the inductive reactive 120 phased
      currents are measured, no mutual induction between the 120 phased
      currents exists, as only the poles of the 10 coil winding structure
      are adjacent to each other in space.

      Now these two sets of columns of coils are wound in opposite
      directions. This was for the convenience of wiring each LC segment in
      equal magnetic directions. Of course it is assumed that any polarity
      reversal of wiring can be countered by the respective reversal of
      that segments polarity (phasing) inputs. In this particular instance
      if two equally ordered LC segments were to appear in series, with the
      columns of coils all wound in the same direction, a uniform magnetic
      field in the core would be established, and if we now bent the
      entire column in half, the core magnetic field would then be in a
      circle, or toroid. But the winding directions of each column then
      would be oppositely wound with respect to each other. If we were to
      now split the LC series sets in two so that they appeared in parallel
      to two stator line outputs, they would appear as oppositely phased
      series resonances, meaning that when one coils system pole produces a
      North pole, the adjacent system's pole should be opposite, or South;
      they are not. So one systems North pole then correctly induces a
      North pole on its neighboring column, so that both the effects of
      polarity of the resonance by LC orderings, and the correct wiring
      directions are observed which becomes a confusing issue since an
      incorrect wiring can always be resolved by reversing the polarity

      Of particular interest in the case of magnetic reactions according to
      THREE PHASE impedance measurements OF AIR CORE COLUMNS; IS EXACTLY
      COMPARISONS AND RESONANT ONES! [With three phase we can
      1)make a measurement in isolation of the phases impedance without a
      resonant capacity in series
      2) make a measurement with adjacent phases as three reactances for
      the mutual induction effect experienced solely as reactive mutual
      induction effects
      3) perhaps more importantly two adjacent phases placed into resonance
      can now be compared for the mutual inductance effects upon the
      reactive effects remaining as the sole phase that is not resonated
      and to compare this ohmic value to that of the one experienced when
      compared to its solitary action.
      Apparently when two adjacent columns from only two of three
      available phases are employed showing only the weakest indications of
      mutual reactance, when the columns themselves are resonated they
      display a marked increase in mutual inductance, so that reactively
      they display a very loose magnetic coupling, but resonantly the
      coupling is much greater!
      However when three columns of three phase 120 degree inputs are
      placed together the effect of mutual induction experienced as
      reactive amperage consumptions is readily seen according to theory,
      whereby simply changing the direction of one phases coil current will
      readily make a change in the partners experienced reactive current.

      Thus to explain simply, two adjacently phased columns show no
      mutual induction as reactive readings, but on resonance they do. If
      in turn those columns are arranged to produce magnetic fields in
      opposition; rather then unity, the q factor voltage gain between the
      opposite systems is increased, in direct contrast to ordinary q gain
      systems whereby by an increase of inductance by mutual inductance
      guarantees an increase of q factor by the new acting L value secured
      by mutual inductance. This unique instance, whereby things work
      backwards according to conventional thinking of course becomes food
      for thought. In this instance of q comparisons, if the columns were
      placed in magnetic unity ~ 500 volts would be between the systems q
      values of interphasal voltage rise, but the correct magnetic
      interaction of making identical poles in time for magnetic
      compression would yield 600 volts between the potentials.
      Furthermore these potentials could also manipulated on the output end
      to act with a doubled q factor with respect to ordinary line coupled
      resonant action, to make it appear as efficient as the ordinary
      ferromagnetic transformer.

      Here are the two options of measurement that may not be immediately
      obvious, and later shows by actual phasal measurements that if the
      usual resonant laws are applied to a branch that has
      been "incorrectly" wired, the inductive reactive measurement itself
      that should determine its correct balancing capacitive reactance;
      itself when presented with the correct value of capacity in turn
      delivers a corresponding drop in resonance, and not a gain as would
      normally be suspected.

      The problem begins with the tossing of three coins, each either
      black or white on the sides. In the idea of producing tri-equally
      spacing of three phase revolving magnetic fields in time; the
      tossing of the coins only represents the random placings of either
      clockwise or counterclockwise wound coil lengths that in turn are
      allowed to be corrected by reversal of inputs; IF NEEDS BE.

      As it turns out; several varieties of interaction do seem to occur
      between three phases; whereas the LC placement values in space do not
      seem to be altered, but the output interactions between the phases
      certainly do seem to be different. The same geometrical arrangement
      of coils seems to have provided three different effects, but for now
      the present effect should be noted.

      This effect is noted that the one coil group wound opposite to the
      other two forms the basis for each oppositely wound coil group to
      react against, polarity wise with respect to interphasal voltage
      measurements. Phase 1 and phase 3 are the two bottom triangular
      groups, whereby phase 3 is the only counterwound phase. Phase 2 sets
      as a group of 11 coils needed to balance the inductance of the bottom
      groups of 10 coils in series. Phase 2 sets on top of the triangle.

      Now then if we had three phases of three adjacent columns of coils,
      all wound in the same direction, the expression of "correct"
      connections with regard to winding directions can be noted. Each
      stator line is connected to either a capacitor or a coil length
      ending from two different phases. If three adjacent columns of coils
      were all wound in identical directions, the correct wiring to produce
      a three phase effect of rotating magnetic fields; that is to obtain
      each phase at 120 degrees phase angle reference point from its
      neighboring phase; the correct wiring would be stator /coil
      connections all identically made from one side of the coil lengths.

      Now phases 1 and 2 are the left and top triangular columns as viewed
      from north, and they are both wound clockwise, but phase three is
      wound counterclockwise, so as to compensate for its opposite winding
      with respect to the other phases, it's stator line connection to the
      ending coil length is then made opposite with respect to the other
      two phases. A typical "correct" arrangement of this is contained
      from notes of many sessions of recording of mutual inductance, of
      which remarkably only conceptually two possibilities of combinations
      in three phase conceptually show themselves, however the
      experimentation seems to show that more then two variations may exist.
      From recorded notes;
      12 May 05
      Wavetek LCR measurements
      System was reconfigured here from two rows of 15 spools each, and
      which each of the two columns were made as oppositely wound spool
      Phases 1 and 2 consisted of the adjacent sets of ten coils each
      ending on the south side. The north side of the coil system held ten
      coils arranged as two sets of five on each side, each oppositely
      wound. The direction of windings were so that all the 30 coils were
      in magnetic unison as a loop of a toroidal magnetic flux when
      subjected as elements of 30 coils in series, as would be in the case
      of a DC voltage input, each coil in turn is wired so that its
      magnetic field contributes in unison to all other coils contributing
      to the loop of magnetic field expressed in a square elongated circle.
      In certain instances of placing ten coils in a series in correct
      magnetic wiring, a single spool of 500 ft/ 14 gauge wire may register
      11 mh in isolation but when ten of these coil spools are combined in
      compacted poles in series they register values close to 150 mh:
      whereas if the coils were spaced apart so that no mutual induction
      came into play they would register 110 mh by additional of solitary
      inductive values. So here we see that ~ one third additional
      reactance is made by close spacing of poles on respective units
      divided into ten on the total wire length.

      Phase 1 : 150.4 mh
      Phase 2 : 148 mh
      Phase 3 : 154.3 mh
      No inductance change was noted by measuring phase two while shorting
      phase 1 showing that no LCR meter measurements indicate any mutual
      inductance between the adjacent columns of phases 1 and 2. In this
      situation resonating either phase 1 or 2, and shorting out the
      adjacent LC loop to record resonant amperage induction shows that ΒΌ
      of the amperage on the solitary powered phase will appear on the
      unpowered phase by resonant air core induction. Thus in this
      particular case no changes in capacity need be made to L1C1 in order
      to effect current on L2C2, because the presence of the adjacent
      closed loop L2 has no effect on the a LCR meter measurement of L1's

      Dec 05/05
      Reactance readings
      (to be continued from notes)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.