## Re: [teslafy] Honorary Thinker Award/ Jones Beene

Expand Messages
• ... Heres a jpeg where I left off on this work; 7.6 A SrFe Conductions Via wall & alternator input http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/SP/Dsc00754.jpg
Message 1 of 5 , Jun 11, 2005
• 0 Attachment
--- Jones Beene <jonesb9@...> wrote:

> Hey Harvey,
>
> Thanks for the compliments. I had totally forgotten
> post.
>
> But come to think of it, if HTSC (high temperature
> superconductivity) ever does become commercial,
> something like
> that might work.
Heres a jpeg where I left off on this work;
7.6 A SrFe Conductions Via wall & alternator input
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/SP/Dsc00754.jpg

Early (AC alternator)experiments showed that when the
"acting resistance" of a ferrite glow was at 7 ohms
the load and the networks are "impedance matched" so
to speak, since the reactance of the delivery wires
are also 7 ohms. If the resistance of the load were to
go below this seven ohms; this drives the alternator
resonant 480 hz circuit in the direction of a tank
circuit; where resonant rise of amperage may appear,
with the net effect of a greater efficiency of power
delivery.

So what was done here was to merge two DC currents
through the ferrite, one obtained from a wall voltage
about 15 volts DC, and the other input the alternator
resonant one.

The nornal operation of the alternator resonant
circuit for a ~60 watt empowerment to produce the glow
is 21 volts enabling 3 A, showing that a 3 A
conduction yeilds a resistance of 7 ohms.

In the jpeg the currents through the piece have gone
to 7.6 A a 2.5 fold increase of current.

If things were linear we might suppose the the
resistance should drop 2.5 times inveresely linear to
the 2.5 fold amperage increase.

So here with both inputs 13.8 volts is enabling a
combined 7.6 A for an acting resistance of 1.8 ohms

7/2.5 = 2.8 ohms.

These are only just some rough estimates but it
appears the acting resistance itself may be a bit
non-linear.
The net result of the extra wall source delivering
amperage through the piece on the alternator resonant
circuit was that now its "interphasal load" has been
reduced from 7 ohms to 1.8 ohms making its circuit
more efficient in delivery of that 3.74 A portion of
amperage to the shown ferrite glow.

> And since you mentioned some of the early "wireless"
> pioneers,
> three of your
> pancake coils to "self-spin" on good ball bearings -
> using ambient
> radio "waves" (near a three phase HV line) as the
> "hidden" power
> source.
>
> Not OU, but it would amaze people who did not catch
> on to what was
> going on...
>
> Of course 60 cycle is a very long wavelength, 5 km,
> but have you
> ever found a far shorter coil that was strongly
> resonant for 60
> cycle? Let's see... 78.125 meters ( 5Km/ 8*8) is
> probably too long
> for a pancake coil, but is 19.53 meters possible?
>
> Jones
>
> Opps, these figures are based on lightspeed in a
> vacuum and would
> need to be corrected for copper/aluminum....
Numbers may be a bit off here.
The following info is from
http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/tesla.htm
Our
Navy manages to transmit a 75 Hz frequency to our
submarines but has to use a 768-mile long quarter-wave
antenna in Wisconsin to do it."

HDN; meters/sec divided by cycles/sec actually yeilds
an answer in the terms of meters/cycle. Mike seems
correct in then stating that the "actual" quarter wave
resonator would then be a length of one quarter of
this derived full wave length value. Now we can go
further and analyze the stated resonant value given
for a 768 mile antennae.
First we multiply by 4 to obtain the wavelength at
3072 miles Dividing by the speed of light at 186,000
miles /sec yeilds a time period of .0165 seconds for
one cycle. The reciprocal of this is 60.5
hz. So what gives with the 75 hz answer in the
example? Well as Paul Nicholson has pointed out, the
quarter wave length theory is only a guideline, and in
most all examples with tesla coils, the actual
resonant frequency is slightly higher than that given
by the quarter wavelength example.

I seem to remember being at Ann Arbor Mich at the
University there, and the physics dept may have some
studies associated on a display chart of the system,
and for some reason there were also dealing with
superconductivity?? Perhaps they need huge amperage
surges to communicate through the earth with this long
antenna. I seem to remeber a 22 mile quote, which
might have beeen the diameter of the buried spiral. A
lot of speculation here.

HDN

Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
Message 2 of 5 , Aug 21, 2008
• 0 Attachment

--- In teslafy@yahoogroups.com, Harvey Norris <harvich@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- Jones Beene <jonesb9@...> wrote:
>
> > Hey Harvey,
> >
> > Thanks for the compliments. I had totally forgotten
> > post.
> >
> > But come to think of it, if HTSC (high temperature
> > superconductivity) ever does become commercial,
> > something like
> > that might work.
> Heres a jpeg where I left off on this work;
> 7.6 A SrFe Conductions Via wall & alternator input
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/files/SP/Dsc00754.jpg
>
> Early (AC alternator)experiments showed that when the
> "acting resistance" of a ferrite glow was at 7 ohms
> the load and the networks are "impedance matched" so
> to speak, since the reactance of the delivery wires
> are also 7 ohms. If the resistance of the load were to
> go below this seven ohms; this drives the alternator
> resonant 480 hz circuit in the direction of a tank
> circuit; where resonant rise of amperage may appear,
> with the net effect of a greater efficiency of power
> delivery.
>
> So what was done here was to merge two DC currents
> through the ferrite, one obtained from a wall voltage
> about 15 volts DC, and the other input the alternator
> resonant one.
>
> The nornal operation of the alternator resonant
> circuit for a ~60 watt empowerment to produce the glow
> is 21 volts enabling 3 A, showing that a 3 A
> conduction yeilds a resistance of 7 ohms.
>
> In the jpeg the currents through the piece have gone
> to 7.6 A a 2.5 fold increase of current.
>
> If things were linear we might suppose the the
> resistance should drop 2.5 times inveresely linear to
> the 2.5 fold amperage increase.
>
> So here with both inputs 13.8 volts is enabling a
> combined 7.6 A for an acting resistance of 1.8 ohms
>
> 7/2.5 = 2.8 ohms.
>
> These are only just some rough estimates but it
> appears the acting resistance itself may be a bit
> non-linear.
> The net result of the extra wall source delivering
> amperage through the piece on the alternator resonant
> circuit was that now its "interphasal load" has been
> reduced from 7 ohms to 1.8 ohms making its circuit
> more efficient in delivery of that 3.74 A portion of
> amperage to the shown ferrite glow.
>
> > And since you mentioned some of the early "wireless"
> > pioneers,
> > three of your
> > pancake coils to "self-spin" on good ball bearings -
> > using ambient
> > radio "waves" (near a three phase HV line) as the
> > "hidden" power
> > source.
> >
> > Not OU, but it would amaze people who did not catch
> > on to what was
> > going on...
> >
> > Of course 60 cycle is a very long wavelength, 5 km,
> > but have you
> > ever found a far shorter coil that was strongly
> > resonant for 60
> > cycle? Let's see... 78.125 meters ( 5Km/ 8*8) is
> > probably too long
> > for a pancake coil, but is 19.53 meters possible?
> >
> > Jones
> >
> > Opps, these figures are based on lightspeed in a
> > vacuum and would
> > need to be corrected for copper/aluminum....
> Numbers may be a bit off here.
> The following info is from
> http://www.mikebrownsolutions.com/tesla.htm
> Our
> Navy manages to transmit a 75 Hz frequency to our
> submarines but has to use a 768-mile long quarter-wave
> antenna in Wisconsin to do it."
>
> HDN; meters/sec divided by cycles/sec actually yeilds
> an answer in the terms of meters/cycle. Mike seems
> correct in then stating that the "actual" quarter wave
> resonator would then be a length of one quarter of
> this derived full wave length value. Now we can go
> further and analyze the stated resonant value given
> for a 768 mile antennae.
> First we multiply by 4 to obtain the wavelength at
> 3072 miles Dividing by the speed of light at 186,000
> miles /sec yeilds a time period of .0165 seconds for
> one cycle. The reciprocal of this is 60.5
> hz. So what gives with the 75 hz answer in the
> example? Well as Paul Nicholson has pointed out, the
> quarter wave length theory is only a guideline, and in
> most all examples with tesla coils, the actual
> resonant frequency is slightly higher than that given
> by the quarter wavelength example.
>
> I seem to remember being at Ann Arbor Mich at the
> University there, and the physics dept may have some
> studies associated on a display chart of the system,
> and for some reason there were also dealing with
> superconductivity?? Perhaps they need huge amperage
> surges to communicate through the earth with this long
> antenna. I seem to remeber a 22 mile quote, which
> might have beeen the diameter of the buried spiral. A
> lot of speculation here.
>
> HDN
>
>
> Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal
Resonances http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
>
• ... Kewl ... Chris - BTW does the nanolube contain Buckey-Balls ? Now if you can just connect the fans to an electric genset and then put a hybrid drive train
Message 3 of 5 , Aug 21, 2008
• 0 Attachment
--- Chris Arnold wrote:

Kewl ... Chris - BTW does the nanolube contain
"Buckey-Balls"?

Now if you can just connect the fans to an electric
genset and then put a hybrid drive train in that
Porsche ... lubricated with the special stuff, of
course ... voila: a 'free ride' on a windy day? ...
perfect for Chicago.
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.