Expand Messages
• Yeah about a week ago I went to post something here, but I misspelled the teslafy address from yahoo mailbox. So it never got delivered. Better late then
Message 1 of 1 , Jun 7, 2005
• 0 Attachment
Yeah about a week ago I went to post something here, but I misspelled
the teslafy address from yahoo mailbox. So it never got delivered.
Better late then never. I was looking at things from a certain
viewpoint, but it takes awhile for realization to set in. Once the
realization set in I began to realize how my viewpoint was wrong. The
concept of voltage having to be in phase with amperage for a
definition of true power delivery was that guideline. I had wrote
from a past entry;
Transcending Reactive vs Real Power Concepts.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/message/1520
Here is where the kicker comes in; the apparent power
in is yeilding almost the same amount as real power
out!.
(This was concerning the SrFe heating effect where I surmised that
according to phase angle laws perhaps my actual power in was less
then the real power out.)

Later I understood the phase angle definitions for what consists of a
real power inpuut are inadequate for definitions of tank circuits. In
fact we have to think in a different way for those cases. And I
imagine there is no real free energy gain there at all. I like to
remain a skeptic; and keep questioning things until a logical answer
is arrived at. Once I realized this logical answer; I felt like an

But there are still some things that create doubt in my mind. My
early air core alternator experiments (from several years ago)seemed
to show that a series resonance had currents closely in phase with
the impressed voltage; and the parallel resonance phenomenon was
exactly opposite to this; in that those currents would be exactly
OPPOSITE to the impressed voltage. This however creates a mental
dilemma in that it seems impossible for that to happen. A reactive
current can only be at most 90 degrees out of phase with the
voltage ; and to make it have another 90 degrees difference should be
impossible. You need those extra 90 degrees difference to satisfy the
parameters for that problem, so that it could actually be 180 degrees
out of phase. But those things seemed to be the case when
investigating facets of air core transformers.

In any case my mind and body is growing tired now, and I give up even
everything. But I am tired of thinking about it. The mind grows tired
with age. It gives me a headache and I just dont want to think about
these things for now. This is springtime and nature takes over. I am
putting in many plants in the garden, so that is my vocation for now.
The family gives me a little work to supplement income. The great
windfall of asset profits from land sale failed to develope, it will
take maybe another year ...

So when I was feeling sorry and drunk for myself a week ago; I wrote
the following which should be part of these recorded records here..

Wed, 1 Jun 2005

If you concentrate on a subject long enough, the

I only took certain definitions of resonance:
and tried to ascertain the two different definitions
of electrical resonance within my own understanding,
whereby there seemed to be a gap.

Now I think I understand that gap better; but if I had
never questioned it: if I had never forwarded the
questions to others; if I had never questioned it for
myself; I would have never understood it. But now I
understand these things better then before: I am a

It is better to understand for yourself what others
cannot or will not understand. But this is a cop out.
One does not light a fire under a bush and expect it
to go out easily.

I was wrong about some matters: but why the wrong
exists consists of understanding the wrong itself.

The wrong itself starts from the conventional
knowledge given as book understanding. We cannot take
that book understanding and apply it universally, and
that is where the mistake comes into view.

A mistake is a mistake, and that is the best viewpoint
to take after we in fact make a mistake. There may be
one viewpoint to understanding, but that viewpoint is
not universal for all viewpoints.

The definition of amperage being in phase with its
cause of voltage for "real power input" is only one
side of the coin: but we cant flip the coin over and
then say everything is wrong. That was my former
viewpoint which makes me an "electrical knucklehead".

What is the opposite of an an opposite?
From the outside viewpoint of the intellectual mind
these problems seem insurmountable.

But the subconscious is a powerful thing/ you think/
you think? and then the answer is delivered.

And you are quite embarassed when the answer is
delivered. It has been there the whole time. It has
been there but you would not look at that answer.

Everything you think about came from yourself. You
yourself are the cause of these consternations,
therefore you should negate yourself...
Of course I joke here: a better solution then that is
at hand.

The solution is the viewpoint, and how it is applied.
Is it a power factor correction? In terms of tank
circuits it is.

Which side of the coin is correct? Are they both
correct? Is it an enigma wrapped inside a riddle?
It certainly is. Is there a realization there?
There certainly is. But the spelling is in question
also. So I will let this go for now without explaining
further.
HDN

BYE
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.