Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

The "Z" impedance coordinate.

Expand Messages
  • harvich
    Because of the fact of the time lag between idea and its testing ground placed into reality, the reporting of such gets even further backlogged, by this
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 8, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      Because of the fact of the time lag between idea and its testing
      ground placed into reality, the reporting of such gets even further
      backlogged, by this reporter, anyways...

      This is so that convenient theories can be invented in the meantime
      to explain the results to the public.

      Now it is known that impedance is explained with a two dimensional
      graph with reactance vs resistance. The resistance doesnt exactly
      have a negative coordinate, but the reactances do. It is the
      cancelling of reactances that make resonance, when the only
      coordinate vector left is the R value , and ohms law can then dictate
      the ohms conduction. thats how the ideal electrical laws work using
      the ideal components, but actually dont come very close in real world
      action using real world components with large L or C values.

      The loss factors involved are not scientifically sufficiently
      explained whatsover, but what things come down to are comparisons of
      two rates of conduction. One conduction of high q inductive reactance
      established by 60 henry, 1000 ohm coil of 23 gauge wire @ 60 hz
      resonance may only yeild a acting Q voltage rise of 15 fold, where
      the q factor of X(L)/R by theory is 20.

      Let us back calculate things here also to verify the truth. The
      apparent problem grasped by those of us subscribring to phase angle
      laws then becomes a flaw of understanding resonance. Normally the
      conduction established by meter establishes whether an inductor has
      gone into the fullest amount of conduction enabled by resonance. By
      the standard laws the amperage conduction thru elements recorded on
      meter can establish the phase angle. However this is only true when
      the real components match the ideal.

      So at 60 hz, for a 20,000 wind coil of 23 gauge on a 5 inch diameter
      air core employing 9 miles of wire,yeilding 60 henry the real
      conduction at resonance is only 3/4 the actual real value at DC.

      The ordinary electrical engineer has casually told me that since I
      was getting 75 ma conduction from such a 1000 ohm coil instead of the
      expected 100 ma that resonance should deliver, that actually the
      deviance from phase angle was greater than 1/4 of the quadrant, and
      actually the true phase angle was far less!

      This was from Karl Uhlricht even, who has installed a skeptical angle
      of reasoning even further beyond the original.

      However when things were combined in space, it seems the
      amplification of the concept of mutual inductances comes into order.

      Mutual inductances mean the sharing of magnetic field pathways,
      however the concept of flux capacitors means those coils can still
      have a form of mutual inductance provided for by wire connection only.

      When both methods are used the resonance outside of spatial
      interaction zone is different from that inside the interaction zone.
      This is typically re-presented in 90 degree attempts of phasing
      resonances with 120 degree phased inputs.

      In any case what it implies is quite a complication. Initially all
      resistance to input is accounted for by impedance. The portion that
      is reactance can be found and cancelled. For a simple inductance that
      can be measured impedance wise the two dimensional model poses no
      problem. By equation you find both X(L) and X(C) to match.

      In fact what seems to be observed is that by spatially the E cross B
      vessel you get extra impedance, and al la einsteinian relativity you
      easily explain that less capacity does the job, than the former one

      Of course then you get to mention how the Z coordinate comes into
      play. Because of the fact that NET reactance for resonance is made by
      solution of vectors, the three dimensional coordinate brought upon by
      reacting quantities in 3 dimensions is brought into play.

      Then it becomes concievable that actions of producing the greater
      than possible current nodes after junction a real possibility.

      With ordinary current nodes 12 go in and 24 go out. Now at least 25
      can go out. Put one inside the other and see what you get!

      HDN, as usual.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.